My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Charter Commission - 10/21/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Charter Commission
>
2013
>
Agenda - Charter Commission - 10/21/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 1:16:45 PM
Creation date
12/2/2013 10:45:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Charter Commission
Document Date
10/21/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In anticipation of the Charter Commission meeting, my state of mind is to advocate a provision to <br />Charter Chap. 7: <br />Section 7.13 Franchise Fee Bill of Rights. <br />Regardless of any State of Minnesota permissions, City of Ramsey shall not use a franchise <br />fee as a revenue generation process. <br />That as a starting point of what I believe to be good policy, with, however, a willingness to consider: <br />Section 7.13 Franchise Fee Bill of Rights. <br />Regardless of any State of Minnesota permissions, City of Ramsey shall not use a franchise <br />fee as a revenue generation process, unless and until levy limits have been reached in taxing <br />property to support the general fund and a deficit exists between general fund revenue and <br />necessary expenditures. If ever imposed, franchise fee revenue generation shall not be <br />structured in a way proportionately more onerous on the poor and those facing hardship <br />than on those of greater means and greater capacity to pay. <br />Those two alternatives do express what I believe to be good policy, with the latter being more <br />permissive toward government flexibility than the former. A third alternative, taking account of how a <br />PUC regulated utility might be constrained by PUC rules /orders /policy whereas a cooperative is not, <br />there is this third possibility: <br />Section 7.13 Franchise Fee Bill of Rights. <br />Regardless of any State of Minnesota permissions, City of Ramsey shall not use a franchise <br />fee as a revenue generation process, unless and until levy limits have been reached in taxing <br />property to support the general fund and a deficit exists between general fund revenue and <br />necessary expenditures. If ever imposed, franchise fee revenue generation shall not be <br />structured in a way proportionately more onerous on the poor and those facing hardship <br />than on those of greater means and greater capacity to pay. Accordingly, in negotiation of <br />franchise grants to energy providers City representatives in negotiation shall mandate as a <br />contract condition of a franchise grant that disproportionate impact on the poor and <br />destitute shall not happen in any franchise fee pass - through from the franchisee to the <br />energy- consuming public. <br />In that fashion, the City would have flexibility to structure its fee to the franchisee in any manner <br />convenient, so long as fair to the destitute, with the utility then also obligated to assure fairness. <br />That would be my starting point for discussion of Charter language about City of Ramsey and franchise <br />fee use /non -use. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.