My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 12/10/2013
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2013
>
Agenda - Council - 12/10/2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 9:41:17 AM
Creation date
12/11/2013 10:22:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/10/2013
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1207
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
staff was aware that there was a chance the increase would be slightly higher due to healthcare <br />reform fees and the unions were given (and have requested) to have a re -opener to negotiate for the <br />added fees, which came in at 3.3% or 13.3% all together. <br />Staff recommends the City Council consider authorizing the sharing of the premium increases with <br />non -union employees as per one of the attached spreadsheets, limited to the Single, Employee + <br />Spouse, and Employee + Children plans. These spreadsheet options represent the amounts <br />previously negotiated with the unions, or, an option to include a portion of the remaining 3.3 <br />percent that was added to the premiums due to healthcare reform fees. Staff recommends holding <br />the City's contribution on the Family plan at the level that was previously negotiated with the <br />unions in order to reduce costs and work toward more equitable contributions amongst the tiers. <br />Staff recommends option C. Option C falls within the 2014 preliminary budget while 1) <br />maintaining 100% coverage by the City on the least expensive single premium (consistent past with <br />practice and recommended by the City's benefits broker), and 2) offers $130.00 toward the single <br />VEBA contribution (but not $155 as was the case last year). <br />Wages <br />Staff originally accounted for a 2.5% non -union cost -of -living -adjustment (COLA) in the <br />preliminary 2014 budget. A review of market settlements, plus the need to reduce the 2014 <br />preliminary budget, caused the percentage to be reduced to 2%. Concurrently, staff has reviewed the <br />most recent COLA data and found that most City's are coming in at a average COLA of 2%. Staff <br />recommends a 2% COLA be authorized for the non -union employee group. <br />Market Study <br />Staff was asked to conduct a non -union market study. A study was completed on every non -union <br />position in the City. The market area included similarly sized cities in the Metro Area, as well as <br />Elk River (which is considered Central MN) and Andover (which is larger in population) but is very <br />close in proximately. <br />Non -union staff <br />Staff was asked about the make-up of the non -union group; the following list shows the city's <br />non -union positions and F.L.S.A. status (Fair Labor Standards Act): <br />Eligible for <br />Title Overtime / <br />Covered by the <br />F.L.S.A. <br />1 City Administrator (KU) NO <br />2 Police Chief (JW) NO <br />3 Finance Director (DL) NO <br />4 Fire Chief (DK) NO <br />5 City Engineer (BW) NO <br />6 Public Works Superintendent (GR) NO <br />7 Economic Development Manager (TL) NO <br />8 Parks and Asst PW Superintendent (MR) NO <br />9 Police Captain (JK) and (TF) NO <br />10 Asst. Finance Officer (DM) NO <br />11 Human Resources Manager (CL) NO <br />12 Development Services Manager (TG) NO <br />13 Building Official (RJ) NO <br />14 Assistant to the City Administrator (PB) NO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.