My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 01/14/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2014
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 01/14/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:16:33 PM
Creation date
1/15/2014 9:53:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
01/14/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
On October 21, the Charter Commission called a meeting to discuss the provision of the Charter that pertains to <br />funding sources for the City (i.e. franchise fees, general levy, special assessments) and to determine whether <br />applicable Charter amendments should be considered. Following discussion, the Charter made the motion to request <br />that the City Council review and provide feedback regarding a possible amendment to Charter Chapter 10, Section <br />10.4, line 4, "Power of regulation reserved," as follows: " ... except that any franchise fees imposed under <br />applicable State Statutes must be limited to defray increased municipal costs accrued as a result of utility operations <br />and my not be used to raise general operating revenue." <br />The franchise agreement and franchise fee ordinances were brought to the City Council for introduction on October <br />22. Council introduced the franchise ordinances with Anoka Municipal Utility and Connexus (adopted November <br />12). Also at the October 22 meeting, Council was presented with the proposed Charter amendment language <br />pertaining to alternative funding sources, in particular, the use of franchise fees as a funding source. Council voted <br />to indefinitely table consideration of the franchise fee ordinances with Anoka Municipal Utility, CenterPoint Energy <br />and Connexus Energy, and to schedule a joint work session with the Charter Commission to discuss the franchise <br />fee language. <br />On November 19, Council and the Charter met in joint work session to review funding alternatives and to identify <br />pros and cons of those alternatives. The Council and the Charter Commission focused on three viable funding <br />alternatives and discussed the possible solutions associated with each - franchise fees, special assessments, and <br />general property tax levy. The City Attorney summarized the time line as follows: The City Council received the <br />Charter Commission's recommendation on October 22, and a public hearing is scheduled for December 10. The <br />City Council would vote on the proposal at their first regular meeting in January 2014. <br />During the December 10 Council work session, discussion ensued relating to alternative language for a proposed <br />Charter Amendment to Chapter 10. It was noted that there is a desire to have some limits to the franchise fee and <br />how it is applied, which was addressed in the draft alternatives. The alternatives address dedicating all franchise fee <br />revenues to long -term street maintenance program projects; a five -year sunset term for any new franchise fee <br />ordinance; assessments shall not be used for road maintenance projects while franchise fees are in effect; franchise <br />fee revenues shall be limited to a percentage of the annual tax levy; and public notification to assure transparency. It <br />was felt that putting this language within the Charter will provide extra protection but the current amendment <br />language does not well define the limitation (capping as a percentage of the levy) and other issues. <br />Also on December 10, at the regular City Council meeting, a public hearing was held to introduce the ordinance <br />amending Chapter 10 (Franchises) of the City Charter as recommended by the Charter Commission. Attorney <br />Langel reported that staffs recommendation was to deny this amendment because the term to limit franchise fees to <br />"defraying increased municipal costs accruing as a result of utility operations" is ambiguous and leaves open the <br />question to future Councils and the public, subject to potential challenge via lawsuit or other action by residents. He <br />stated this amendment does not have the transparency or ability to define the limits as the Charter Commission has <br />indicated it desires. Staff recommended the Council consider alternative language that outlines the terms and <br />limitations for franchise fees. Council voted to not introduce the ordinance amending Chapter 10 of the Charter and <br />directed staff to draft alternative Charter amendment language and open a dialog with the Charter Commission to <br />obtain their review and comment. <br />This brings us to the present. Attached for Council review is the draft language for a proposed Charter amendment <br />as per Council's direction. Please note that the proposed fee cap, which is based on a percentage of the previous <br />year's tax levy, may require a new fee ordinance each year and will be logistically difficult to administer. The <br />Council may wish to consider a simple flat rate. If there is a Council consensus, this language will be forwarded to <br />the City Council tonight for public discussion and possible transmission to the Charter Commission. The Charter <br />Commission has scheduled a meeting for January 27, in anticipation of reviewing the Charter amendment language <br />forwarded by the City Council. <br />Timeframe: <br />Approximately 30 minutes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.