My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/25/1990
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1990
>
Agenda - Council - 09/25/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2025 11:01:41 AM
Creation date
12/9/2003 9:15:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/25/1990
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />The absence of till at B-129 also provides an additional migration pathway for <br />dense contaminants with specific gravities that are greater than water. These <br />"sinkers" tend to follow topographic lows in the aquifers and would therefore pass <br />directly through the outwash sands and be in contact with the bedrock. <br /> <br />The ability to monitor the site would be directly proportional to the ability to <br />completely identify the holes in the till aqu_i~rO_as shown by B-112 and B-129. <br />Resistivity data also indicated that other areas of the till may not be continuous as <br />well. These results do not seem to be reflected on the cross-sections. <br /> <br />2.5. REVIEW SUMMARY <br /> <br />As previously mentioned, the overall geology/hydrogeology data and methodologies <br />appear to be thorough and accurate. The Scoping Document requirements are basically <br />satisfied with the exception of groundwater quality. This area was basically left <br />untouched. It was loosely alluded to and was mentioned in passing only. Some <br />references were made to discussion of water quality elsewhere in the report but was <br />never addressed. The other areas of concern included aquifer usage estimations, <br />aquitard effectiveness, groundwater monitoring abilities and the reality of remediation <br />efforts. While some differences in data interpretation are expected to occur, these areas <br />of concern surpass interpretational differences and should be more completely explored. <br /> <br />2.6. REVIEW QUESTIONS <br /> <br />Site P <br /> <br />What are the plans for the waste material from the Anoka Regional Sanitary <br />Landfill (ARSL) that has been deposited within the Site P boundaries? <br /> <br />How will the water quality data from December 1988 to the present affect the <br />extent the contamination as shown in Figure P.B. 27. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.