My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/25/1990
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1990
>
Agenda - Council - 09/25/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2025 11:01:41 AM
Creation date
12/9/2003 9:15:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/25/1990
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />shallow drift aquifer. This aquifer is the most vulnerable and has, in fact, already been <br />impacted by the Oak Grove Landfill. The lower drift aquifer and the directly underlying <br />bedrock aquifer are also susceptible to contamination due to the apparent connection of <br />the upper and lower sand units. The glacial till that separates the upper and lower sand <br />units, described in the EIS as "leaky", has been shown to have a downward vertical <br />gradient and is comprised of interbedded layers of sand and gravel, thus limiting the <br />ability to act as an aquitard. The lower drift buried outwasksand aquifer has also <br />reportedly shown signs of contamination from the existing nearby Oak Grove landfill. <br />The Ironton-Galesville bedrock aquifer is in direct contact and therefore directly <br />hydraulically connected with the buried outwash aquifer due tot a bedrock valley existing <br />near the south and southeast portions of Site D. This direct hydraulic connection greatly <br />increases the potential for groundwater impacts. The groundwater monitoring at Site D <br />is greatly complicated due to the existing contamination of surface water as well as the <br />groundwater in both shallow and deep sand units. The ability to differentiate the source <br />of any detected contaminants would be difficult at best. <br /> <br />The intrinsic suitability of Sites D, P, and Q seems to be less than optimal. Conditions at <br />Site P fail to satisfy three of the six primary criteria with Sites D and Q both exceeding <br />one primary criteria, that of the presence of wetlands on-site. All three sites fail to <br />satisfy the majority of the seven secondary criteria without heavily relying on engineering <br />measures to attempt to correct the deficiencies. There appears to be an excessive level <br />of engineering and construction requirements to be addressed to even begin to operate, <br />much less to remediate any possible future contamination. <br /> <br />MPCA Groundwater Contamination Susceptibili~ Report <br /> <br />The 1989 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency report entitled Groundwater <br />Contamination Susceptibility in Minnesota was designed to demonstrate a method of <br />assessing relative groundwater contamination susceptibility. The parameters utilized in <br />the evaluation included aquifer materials, recharge potential, soil materials, and vadose <br /> <br />22 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.