My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/25/1990
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1990
>
Agenda - Council - 09/25/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2025 11:01:41 AM
Creation date
12/9/2003 9:15:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/25/1990
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> VOTING AT OPEN MEETINGS. <br /> <br /> The Open Meeting Law requires that all votes of members must <br />be recorded in a voting journal and that the journal must be made <br />available for public inspection. The statutory provision requiring <br />the body to record the votes of members likely prohibits the public <br />body from taking secret ballots even if the final overall tally is <br />recorded. In the event that the legislature intended to allow <br />secret ballots where the final vote was recorded, the statute would <br />have provided that the vote (singular) of the members would be <br />recorded. The term votes (plural) suggests that individual votes <br />must be recorded. <br /> <br /> Nevertheless it may be argued that a secret ballot is <br />permissible in the event the final collective vote is recorded. <br />This argument would interpret the plural term "votes" in "votes of <br />members" as meaning members collectively voting on more than one <br />issue (i.e. the committee votes on two bills). This line of <br />argument would stress that the legislature could have easily <br />drafted the bill to explicitly require that individual votes be <br />recorded in the event that it meant to have individual votes <br />recorded. Note that the last sentence in the Open Meeting Law <br />provides that "the vote of each member shall be recorded on each <br />appropriation of money .." In the event the legislature intended <br />to require that public bodies record individual votes, the term <br />"votes of members" could have easily been drafted as "the vote of <br />each member." This issue has not been litigated through the <br />appellate courts and remains unsettled. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.