Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> governing body for the current budget period.~9 <br /> <br />One significant aspect of this procedure is that the tapes do not <br />have to be released until all labor contracts for the current <br />budget period are signed by the public employer. In the event one <br />labor contract is not signed, it appears that the public employer <br />will not have to make any tapes of labor negotiations available to <br />anyone until the contract is signed, even if the contents of the <br />tapes deal with labor negotiations for a different labor contract. <br /> <br /> The second narrow exception to the Open Meeting Law allows <br />closed meetings for attorney-client discussions regarding pending <br />litigation. This exception has been long accepted by the Minnesota <br />Supreme Court and was recently added to the list of Open Meeting <br />exceptions in the statute.20 In the MinneaDolis Star & Tribune <br />case, the Minnesota Supreme Court held that a meeting between an <br />agency and its counsel could be closed where the meeting was for <br />the purpose of discussing litigation strategy. The agency had been <br />sued and was involved in immediate, active litigation. In dicta, <br />the Minnesota Supreme Court stated that this exception will almost <br />never extend to the mere request for general legal advice or <br />opinion. <br /> <br /> The Minnesota Court of Appeals has interpreted the rule in <br />the Minneapolis Star & Tribune case to allow closed meetings only <br />to discuss strategy on specific litigation. See Northwest <br /> <br /> 19 Minn. Stat. sec. 471.705, subd. la (1988). <br /> <br /> 20 See MinneaDolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Housinq <br />Redevelopment Authority, 310 Minn. 313, 251 N.W.2d 620 (1976). <br /> <br /> 12 <br /> <br /> <br />