My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/25/1990
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1990
>
Agenda - Council - 09/25/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2025 11:01:41 AM
Creation date
12/9/2003 9:15:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/25/1990
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br /> governing body for the current budget period.~9 <br /> <br />One significant aspect of this procedure is that the tapes do not <br />have to be released until all labor contracts for the current <br />budget period are signed by the public employer. In the event one <br />labor contract is not signed, it appears that the public employer <br />will not have to make any tapes of labor negotiations available to <br />anyone until the contract is signed, even if the contents of the <br />tapes deal with labor negotiations for a different labor contract. <br /> <br /> The second narrow exception to the Open Meeting Law allows <br />closed meetings for attorney-client discussions regarding pending <br />litigation. This exception has been long accepted by the Minnesota <br />Supreme Court and was recently added to the list of Open Meeting <br />exceptions in the statute.20 In the MinneaDolis Star & Tribune <br />case, the Minnesota Supreme Court held that a meeting between an <br />agency and its counsel could be closed where the meeting was for <br />the purpose of discussing litigation strategy. The agency had been <br />sued and was involved in immediate, active litigation. In dicta, <br />the Minnesota Supreme Court stated that this exception will almost <br />never extend to the mere request for general legal advice or <br />opinion. <br /> <br /> The Minnesota Court of Appeals has interpreted the rule in <br />the Minneapolis Star & Tribune case to allow closed meetings only <br />to discuss strategy on specific litigation. See Northwest <br /> <br /> 19 Minn. Stat. sec. 471.705, subd. la (1988). <br /> <br /> 20 See MinneaDolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Housinq <br />Redevelopment Authority, 310 Minn. 313, 251 N.W.2d 620 (1976). <br /> <br /> 12 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.