Laserfiche WebLink
TO: <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />RE: <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />Ramsey City Council <br /> <br />William K. Goodrich, City Attorney <br /> <br />March 20, 1991 <br /> <br />Open Meeting Law/Data Practices Act in Hiring Process <br /> <br />This Memorandum is in response to several questions regarding the <br />interviewing/hiring process of a new City Administrator for the <br />city of Ramsey. Of particular concern are the various issues <br />arising in the apparent conflict between the Open Meeting Law and <br />the Government Data Practices Act. Ms. Sandra Ashley Helling, <br />acting city Administrator, has also inquired under what <br />circumstances a "meeting" is subject to the requirements of the <br />Open Meeting Law. <br /> <br />Municipalities have not been the only entities to struggle with the <br />difficult issue regarding the apparent conflict between the Open <br />Meeting Law and the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. Both <br />the courts, through judicial interpretation, and the legislature <br />by amendment, have repeatedly attempted to reconcile the <br />conflicting public policies regarding the two statutory creations. <br />Simply stated, the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act provides <br />that all data collected, maintained or received by a public body <br />on individuals is private or confidential. Minn. Stat. §13.03, <br />subd. 1 (1988). On the other hand, the Open Meeting Law broadly <br />mandates that public bodies are to meet in public. Minn. Stat. <br />§471.705, subd. 1 (1988). Meetings subject to the Open Meeting Law <br />include those meetings of committees and subcommittees so that a <br />governing body cannot evade the Open Meeting Law by calling itself <br />a subcommittee. St. Cloud Newspapers, Inc. vs. District 742 <br />Community Schools, 332 N.W.2d 1, 7 (Minn. 1983). <br /> <br />Analyzing the Open Meeting Law in conjunction with the Data Privacy <br />Act, as they relate to interviewing and hiring a new City <br />Administrator, necessitates a brief overview of each act <br />individually. First, although the Minnesota Government Data <br />Practices Act simply states that all government data "shall be <br />public" the standard is modified by extensive exceptions and <br />limitations which recognize non-public, private or confidential <br />government data. In the context of applicants for public <br />employment, only the following data on either current or former <br />applicants is public data for purposes of the Minnesota Government <br />Data Practices Act: <br /> <br />veteran's status; relevant test scores; rank on eligible <br />job lists; job history; education and training; and work <br />availability. Minn. Stat. §13.43, subd. 3 (1988). <br /> <br /> <br />