My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Charter Commission - 01/27/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Charter Commission
>
2014
>
Agenda - Charter Commission - 01/27/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 1:17:34 PM
Creation date
1/29/2014 11:45:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Charter Commission
Document Date
01/27/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember LeTourneau stated the other threat is the City has a known need that is projected <br />over time and the whole concept is to have a sustainable model to do the work needed on the <br />roads. With this level of restriction, it creates a variable and high probability that even in the first <br />year, funds may not meet project needs, depleting the true spirit of the exercise. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated the Charter Commission wants to see a restriction through a <br />percentage or dollar amount and maybe also capture other components such as having a fixed <br />rate that would be easier to calculate. He stated a flat fee is an option because it captures that <br />level of funding and is at about the 20 %. <br />Mayor Strommen stated this is being forwarded to the Charter Commission and suggested this <br />language be flagged so they can provide input relating to the Council's goal for an upper limit <br />while still providing sustainable funding for road maintenance costs that have been based on <br />assumptions. <br />Councilmember LeTourneau asked if it is more about the cumbersome nature of going to the <br />Charter Commission in five years to meet a new number. <br />Mayor Strommen stated if subject to change, it belongs in an ordinance instead of in the Charter. <br />The purpose of the Charter is governance- related issues so it is not wise to put a number in the <br />Charter that has to be amended over time. <br />Finance Director Lund stated if the franchise fee number changes each year, she would ask <br />whether both utility ordinances also have to be amended since the utility ordinance language <br />included the dollar number. <br />City Attorney Langel stated that is correct. He reviewed the final paragraph language and stated <br />the content of the notice is up for some discussion (projects completed versus projects still in <br />play), and why the money is being solicited and its purpose. <br />Councilmember Johns asked if this notice can be inserted with utility bills or posted to the City' s <br />website. <br />Mayor Strommen stated the Charter requires the City to do other mailings, such as with the <br />City' s newsletter. <br />City Attorney Langel recalled that the utilities also send out an annual notice about franchise fees <br />to tell their customer it is not a utility fee but a City fee. He stated it may be possible to work out <br />a combined notice. <br />Mayor Strommen stated the Council also wanted a mechanism to report balances and assure the <br />money is spent for its intended purpose. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that information is important and he would support the most cost <br />effective and efficient method to provide that public notice. <br />City Council Work Session / January 14, 2014 <br />Page 5 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.