Laserfiche WebLink
· RESTORATION OF TURF SURROUNDING THE SIDE SLOPES OF THE POND <br /> <br />Following construction of liner, side slopes of the pond will need to be graded and turf <br />restored to prevent erosion of the side slopes into the pond. <br />The Homeowners Position: At their request, the homeowners were supplied with a copy <br />of the technical specification which the developer's engineer prepared to solicit a bid from <br />the contractor. The homeowners have interpreted a section of this specification such that <br />the contractor would place sod to within twenty feet of their houses. <br />The Contractor's Position: The contractor intends to restore all disturbed areas of the side <br />slope with topsoil, seed and mulch up to areas of established vegetation. In most cases, it <br />would appear that such disturbed areas would not need to extend to the top of the pond side <br />slope. <br />Tlae City's Position: The City would define the pond as beginning at the top of the side <br />slope. Tuff establishment by seeding and mulching to this point would be acceptable. In <br />interpreting the intent of the agreement, the belief is that the developer needs to provide a <br />pond which is not subject to erosion. The acceptable quality of that turf might be <br />considered similar to that required for the establishment of vegetation behind newly poured <br />curblines to prevent excessive mn-off of material into the streets. <br /> <br />· WHEN WILL THE COMPI.F. TED POND BE FILLED WITH WATER <br /> <br />Construction specifications require permeability tests on the clay liner to insure water <br />tightness of the pond. The developer had anticipated allowing the pond to fill naturally <br />with mn-off and precipitation. It would be possible to fill the pond from the City water <br />supply, however, the cost for providing the water would be in the neighborhood of <br />$2,000. <br />The Homepwncr'~ Position: The homeowners feel the pond should be filled upon <br />completion of the construction this Fall. Mrs. Fessler indicated she had spoken with an <br />individual at Mn/DOT who suggested that should a clay liner dry out, fissures in the clay <br />could destroy the impermeability of the liner. <br />The City's Position: The City feels that water is included in the definition of "pond". In <br />addition, unless a soils engineer would specifically state that shr/nkage of the clay over the <br />winter period would not be a problem, the City would insist on pond filling from a <br />technical aspect also. <br />The Developer's Position: The developer would prefer to fill the pond following <br />construction only if that were the recommendation of the soils engineer for the purpose of <br />protecting the liner. <br /> <br />In addition to the above issues, several questions were directed regarding this pond. Below is a <br />summary of those questions and City responses. <br /> <br />· During storm events, when water fills in the pond to a level above the clay liner, will there be <br /> an elevation of the local groundwater which might increase the potential for wet basements? <br /> <br />The groundwater in the area is known lower than 879 since there is no evidence of water in the <br />bottom of the rough grade pond. The basement elevations of the houses along the pond are <br />approximately 886, which would be higher than the ultimate water level of 885. It is the <br />opinion of the City Engineer that groundwater level, even at high water conditions, would not <br />cause wet basements. <br /> <br /> <br />