Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />CASE <br /> <br /> FRANCHISE FEES <br />By: Ryan R. Schroeder, City Administrator <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Recently at the Budget Committee meeting, Staff suggested the option of levying a franchise fee or <br />a gross earnings tax against public utilities, namely Midwest Gas and Anoka Electric Cooperative, <br />as a means of compensating the City for increased cost accruing as a result of the utility operations <br />or as a means of raising revenue. <br /> <br />There arc several cities in Minnesota that currently have either gross earnings tax or franchise fees <br />and there are others that have been considering such, as of late. It is my understanding that in the <br />Metropolitan Area, currently utilizing one of the two are: <br /> <br />CITY ~ GAS <br />Coon Rapids 4.0% 4.0% <br />Lake City 2.5 % <br />Minneapolis 6.5 % 6.5 % <br />St. Cloud 3.0% 3.0% <br />St. Paul 8.0% 8.0% <br />Sleepy Eye 5.0% 2.0% <br />South St. Paul 3.0% 3.0% <br />Waseca (Residential) 5.0% 3.0% <br />Waseca (Commercial) 3.0% <br />West St. Paul 5.0% <br />White Bear Lake 1.5% <br />Winona 4.0% <br /> <br />STEAM HEAT <br /> 5.0% <br /> <br />I have contacted both Midwest Gas and Anoka Electric Cooperative. Currently Midwest Gas has <br />3,145 residential customers, 137 commercial customers and four industrial customers in the City <br />of Ramsey. For the month of October 1991 their gross revenues for residential customers were <br />$87,537.32, for commercial $16,452.48 and for industrial $90.45. I have not yet received like <br />information from the electric company. <br /> <br />Given the above, assuming that October is a normal month for gas usage (I'm not at all certain <br />whether or not it is), a 3% gross earnings or franchise fee tax would result in a revenue of $37,469 <br />and 2% would raise $24,979. I would imagine that this tax assessed upon the electric utility would <br />raise similar annual revenues. <br /> <br />Attached for your consideration is the gross earnings tax ordinance of the City of Coon Rapids <br />which was in effect through 1991 prior to a recent change in the amount from 3% to 4%. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />I <br />! <br /> <br />Staff recommends preparing a draft ordinance of a gross earnings tax for consideration by the <br />Budget Committee. <br /> <br />Council Action: <br /> <br />Motion to direct that the Budget Committee consider a public utility gross earnings tax. <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br />'1 <br /> <br />Review Checklist: <br /> <br />City Administrator <br />Finance Officer <br /> <br />CC: 12/17/91 <br /> <br /> <br />