My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 12/17/1991
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1991
>
Agenda - Council - 12/17/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2025 9:42:23 AM
Creation date
12/10/2003 2:08:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/17/1991
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
225
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CASE <br /> <br /> 1992 LEGAL SERVICES <br />By: Ryan R. Schroeder, City Administrator <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Pursuant to recent Council direction, Staff has submitted requests for proposals for general legal <br />prosecution and development legal services. A copy of the request for proposals is enclosed for <br />your review. <br /> <br />At the time of preparation of this agenda case, we have received one submittal and expect to receive <br />a total of four or five. The firms that we have requested proposals from include: Randall, Dehn & <br />Goodrich from Anoka, Mark Karney from St Paul, Burke & Hawkins from Coon Rapids, <br />Rosenthal, Rondoni & MacMillan from New Hope, Newquist and Eckstrum from Fridley, <br />Holmes & Graven from Minneapolis and Olson Usset from Edina. All of these firms have <br />municipal legal experience and all are either currently serving or have served in the past cities in the <br />Anoka County area. <br /> <br />! expect to receive fairly lengthy proposals and that each of the firms will be fairly competitive in <br />price. However, there is more than economics involved in the choice for city attorneys and I <br />therefore expect that an interview process should be set up in order to critically evaluate the various <br />proposers. Staff is requesting that City Council suggest such a process and a time line for <br />completion of this process. <br /> <br />Council Action: <br /> <br />Based upon discussion. <br /> <br />Review Checklist: <br /> <br />City Administrator <br /> <br />CC: 12/17/91 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.