05/23/91 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Commissioner moved the adoption of the following f'mdings of fact: FINDINGS OF FACT # REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO STREET FRONTAGE REQUIREMENTS PIN 10-32-25-11-0001 That Tim and Brenda Smith, hereinafter referred to as "Applicant", have properly applied for a Board of Adjustment variance from Chapter 9.02 (Street Frontage) on the property generally known as PIN 10-32-25-11-0001. and legally described as follows: That part of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 10, Township 32, Range 25, Anoka County, Minnesota, lying south of the north 471.50 feet thereof, and lying west of the east 1100.00 feet thereof. A public hearing was conducted by the Board of Adjustment pursuant to Chapter 9.03.05 (Variances) of the Ramsey City Code on May 23, 1991 and that said public hearing was properly advertised and that the minutes of said public hearing are hereby incorporated as a part of these findings by reference. Further, that the Applicant did appear before the Board of Adjustment at its special meeting on May 23, 1991. o That the subject property is zoned R-1 Rural Residential and is approximately 7.4 acres in size. 4. That the subject property is surrounded by R-1 Rural Residential zoning. That Chapter 9.02 of the Ramsey City Code states that in no case shall the street frontage in the Urban area be less than 200 feet. o That the principal structure on the subject property is constructed at least 425 feet from the southern property line. 7. That the City has granted variances for a similar request previously. o That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right similar to that possessed by other owners of parcels in the City. 9. That the special conditions do not result from the actions of the Applicant. 10. That the granting of the variance will not grant the Applicant any special privilege that is denied by this chapter to other owners of land in the same district. 1 1. That the variance requested is a minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. 12. That if granted, the variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this chapter or other property in the same zone. 13. That if granted, the variance will not increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety, or substantially impair property values within the neighborhood. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing findings of fact was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: