05/23/91 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Commissioner moved the adoption of the following £mdings of fact: FINDINGS OF FACT # REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS PIN 28-32-25-33-0011 7944 142nd AVENUE N.W. That Patrick Boedigheimer, hereinafter referred to as "Applicant", has properly applied for a Board of Adjustment variance from Chapter 9.11.02 Subd 7 (Accessory Uses) on the property generally known as 7944 - 142nd Avenue N.W. and legally described as follows: Lot 4 Block 3 Alpaca Estates A public hearing was conducted by the Board of Adjustment pursuant to Chapter 9.03.05 (Variances) of the Ramsey City Code on May 23, 1991 and that said public heating was properly advertised and that the minutes of said public hearing are hereby incorporated as a part of these findings by reference. Further, that the Applicant did appear before the Board of Adjustment at its special meeting on May 23, 1991. o That the subject property is zoned R-1 Rural Residential and is approximately 2.5 acres in size. 4. That the subject property is surrounded by R-1 Rural Residential zoning. That Chapter 9.11.02 Subd 7 of the Ramsey City Code states that no accessory building shall be located nearer the front lot line than the principal building on that lot. That the principal structure on the subject property is set back approximately 305 feet from the front property line. That there is not a sufficient amount of space between the principal structure and the east property line to construct the building in the east side yard at the size proposed. o To construct the accessory structure on the west side yard further back from the front lot line then the principal sumcture interfere with the functions of the set back requirements for the Mississippi River Critical River Corridor and natural drainage area. 9. That the Applicant is proposing to construct a 672 square foot accessory structure. 10. That the Applicant has stated that the proposed accessory structure will be used for personal equipment storage purposes. 11. That the City did grant a variance for a similar request in 1983. 12. That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right similar to that possessed by other owners of parcels in the City. 13. That the special conditions do not result from the actions of the Applicant.