My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/11/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2014
>
Agenda - Council - 02/11/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:17:18 PM
Creation date
2/28/2014 10:26:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/11/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
359
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
VPC - Poisonous Pastime - Section One Page 11 of 16 <br />• contamination of ground water, poisoning wells and other water sources; and, <br />• contamination of wetlands or waterways into which lead falls. <br />Shotgun shell casing, wads, and assorted packaging materials can also contain lead, chemicals, <br />and other materials potentially harmful to the environment.65 For example, certain polycyclic <br />aromatic hydrocarbons found in clay targets are said to be known carcinogens.66 (It is worth noting <br />that shotgun shooters rejected a biodegradable clay target Winchester tried to market because it <br />discharged white smoke when hit rather than the black smoke they were used to.)67 <br />Dealing with these problems is complicated by the esoteric nature of the state and federal laws and <br />regulations protecting the environment.k Several key issues of federal environmental law have been <br />roughly focused in a handful of shooting range cases litigated to conclusion. But the NSSF notes <br />that the relatively low number of reported law cases is not a true measure of the activity going on <br />because "many shooting range cases are resolved in the early stages of litigation through consent <br />orders under which the ranges agree to close down and perform further environmental <br />investigations and cleanup at the range."68 <br />Three federal laws have been found to be especially relevant to outdoor shooting ranges: the Clean <br />Water Act (CWA),' the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA),m and the Comprehensive <br />Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA or "Superfund")." Other federal <br />laws may apply to a particular case, and state protections may be more stringent than the <br />applicable federal laws. <br />The Clean Water Act (CWA) <br />The Clean Water Act makes it unlawful for any person to discharge "pollutants" from any "point <br />source" into waters of the United States without obtaining a permit, called a "National Pollution <br />Discharge Elimination System" (NPDES) permit. <br />Two leading federal cases have held that lead shot and target debris (shattered clay pigeons) are <br />"pollutants," and the trap shooting stations at shooting ranges are "point sources." Therefore, any <br />range from which patrons shoot out over "Waters of the United States" must have an NPDES <br />permit. This is a stringent requirement because "Waters of the United States" is broadly defined to <br />include virtually all rivers, streams, lakes, ponds, drainage -ways, wetlands, and similar features, <br />even those on private property, and it appears that, at least to date, no NPDES permit has ever <br />been issued to a shooting range.89 <br />Long Island Soundkeeper Fund, Inc. v. New York Athletic Club° involved a private trap shooting <br />range at which spring launchers were used to toss clay targets out over Long Island Sound. <br />Shooters fired at the clay targets from concrete platforms. Acting on a lawsuit brought by two public <br />interest groups interested in preserving the Long Island Sound environment, the court ruled that <br />"shot and target debris" generated by the shooting range constituted pollutants, and that the range <br />was a point source. It is noteworthy that the court ruled that even though the club had switched to <br />the use of steel shot, the shot was nevertheless a pollutant for purposes of the CWA. The club <br />elected to discontinue the discharge rather than seek a permit.70 <br />Stone v. Naperville Park District settled a dispute over a trap -shooting range in Naperville, Illinois.P <br />The range was reported to have dumped as much as 230 tons of lead over 50 years of use on a <br />small patch of land in a park near a high schoo1.71 The controversy began when neighbors became <br />concerned about possible lead contamination of ground water and wells. Although state officials <br />indicated they would allow the range to continue operation, federal officials expressed concern <br />about lead pollution, especially noting two ponds on the site.72 Eventually the court ruled, consistent <br />with the New York Athletic Club case, that the range's operations fell under the CWA and barred <br />http://www.vpc.org/studies/leadone.htm 2/5/2014 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.