Laserfiche WebLink
Staff recommends selecting Alternative #1 if Council supports the project and is in agreement with the attached draft JPA as drafted. <br />Staff recommends selecting Alternative <br />improvements to old CSAH 5 to reduce <br />Staff recommends selecting Alternative <br />alternative is selected the project would <br />#2 if Council supports the project and is in agreement with the attached draft JPA but would like to incorporate <br />the grade at the north end, which again would be strictly a City expense, or some other minor modification(s). <br />#3 if Council does not support the project and/or the draft JPA without first making significant modifications. If this <br />likely not be able to be completed in 2014 and the federal funding would likely be lost. <br />Action: <br />Alternative #1 — Motion adopting Resolution #14-01-017 approving the draft JPA as written. <br />Alternative #2 — Motion adopting Resolution #14-01-017 approving the draft JPA with the following modifications; <br />Alternative #3 — Motion denying adoption of Resolution #14-01-017 at this time. <br />Res14O1O17 <br />DraftJPA <br />Exhibit A Layout <br />Exhibit B EstCosts <br />MSA Cash Flow <br />Inbox <br />Kurt Ulrich <br />Form Started By: Bruce Westby <br />Final Approval Date: 01/23/2014 <br />Reviewed By <br />Kurt Ulrich <br />Attachments <br />Form Review <br />Date <br />01/23/2014 12:53 PM <br />Started On: 0 1/ 1 7/20 14 08:46 AM <br />