My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/25/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2014
>
Agenda - Council - 02/25/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:17:38 PM
Creation date
2/28/2014 11:14:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/25/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
196
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Our Mission: To work together to responsibly grow our conununity, and to provie quality, cost-effective, an efficient government services <br />CC Regular Session <br />Meeting Date: 02/25/2014 <br />By: Bruce Westby, Engineering/Public Works <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Consider Adopting Resolution #14-02-034 Ordering Preparation of Feasibility Report for Reconstructing Garnet Street and 168th Avenue <br />7. 1. <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The segment of Garnet Street north of 167th Avenue and south of a point approximately 300 feet south of 169th Lane NW, which measures approximately 1,350 <br />feet in length, was originally constructed with bituminous pavement and curbing in 1988, as was the segment of 168th Avenue NW west of Garnet Street, which <br />measures approximately 670 feet in length. Both streets are relatively flat and as such are not able to efficiently shed stormwater runoff, resulting in oil being <br />stripped from the pavement more quickly than normal leading to more rapid degradation of the pavement. Both streets were sealcoated in 2006 but currently <br />have a Pavement and Surface Evaluation Rating (PASER) of 1 and are therefore considered to be among the worst streets in the City in terms of pavement <br />condition. In fact, large areas of Garnet Street are no longer covered with pavement so Public Work's has been filling the non -paved areas with class 5 aggregate <br />recently in an attempt to maintain the streets in a passable condition. However, each spring when the ground thaws the street becomes extremely difficult to <br />navigate and maintain, due primarily to the poor underlying soils which become unstable when saturated with groundwater. Figure 1 (attached) shows the <br />overall project site. <br />In addition to reconstructing the pavement sections of Garnet Street and 168th Avenue, staff is proposing to construct a 6-foot wide concrete sidewalk along the <br />east side of Garnet Street. This new sidewalk segment would serve to connect the existing 6-foot concrete sidewalk on the east side of Garnet Street south of <br />169th Lane NW to the existing sidewalk on the north side of 167th Avenue. Since both existing sidewalks connect to the bituminous trail on the west side of TH <br />47, adding sidewalk along the east side of Garnet Street would allow the existing pedestrian facilities to be fully connected. Figure 2 (attached) shows the <br />existing and proposed pedestrian facilities. As can be seen, all other streets in this area include sidewalks along one side of the street so staff believes it makes <br />sense to connect this lone gap in the sidewalk system. <br />Staff is also proposing to explore costs to construct public utilities as part of this project. Staff feels it is important to consider these costs as part of the <br />Feasibility Report due to the fact that if utilities were added after the street was reconstructed, much of the street would need to be removed and reconstructed at <br />that time. As such, it might be cost-effective to construct public utilities as part of this project, even if some or all of the utilities remain unused for a decade or <br />more. <br />Notification: <br />No notifications are required for this case. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />Observations: <br />Staff is requesting authorization to prepare a Feasibility Report at this time for several reasons. First, staff recommends completing this project in the near future <br />due to the extremely poor condition of the existing pavement sections on these streets. Secondly, if the City is not able to agree on a funding source for our <br />long-term street maintenance program, we will likely have to continue using special assessments to fund a portion of our street reconstruction projects, which <br />requires that a Feasibility Report be completed as part of the public process. And lastly, by completing the Feasibility Report now, staff will be able to provide <br />an accurate estimated cost for this project for future budgeting purposes. And while it is likely too late to reconstruct these streets in 2014 given the fact that a <br />funding source has not yet been identified for street reconstruction projects, by preparing the Feasibility Report now the City would be better positioned to move <br />the project forward more quickly at the time a funding source is identified for such projects. It would also be a relatively simple process to update the Feasibility <br />Report in the future so this work would not "go to waste" if the project is not completed for several years. <br />The Engineering Department is currently short-staffed and has several other higher priority projects in the works so the completion of this report will likely take <br />several months. Once the Feasibility Report is complete, staff will present the report to Council. At that time Council may choose to wait with the project, or <br />they may decide to move forward with the project so a "shovel -ready project" is on the shelves. But again, if special assessments are part of the funding package <br />the public (Chapter 429) process must be followed, including the required public hearings. Staff would also propose to conduct a public information meeting to <br />gather feedback from residents living on these streets regarding the proposed design elements. <br />Alternatives: <br />Alternative Action #1 — Motion to adopt Resolution 14-02-057 Ordering Feasibility Report for Reconstructing Garnet Street and 168th Avenue as proposed by <br />staff. <br />Alternative Action #2 — Motion to adopt Resolution 14-02-057 Ordering Feasibility Report for Reconstructing Garnet Street and 168th Avenue with the <br />following modifications to staffs proposed design alternatives: <br />Alternative Action #3 — Motion to deny adoption of Resolution 14-02-057 at this time. <br />Funding Source: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.