Laserfiche WebLink
CASE # 5 <br />Distributed October 29, 1991 <br /> <br />TAX INCREMENT FINANCING ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS <br /> By: Sandra Ashley Heiling, Finance Officer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />1990 legislation significantly increased the reporting requirements on Tax Increment Financing <br />Districts. As some of these requirements were assigned to counties for the 1991 assessment year, <br />the following provision was made regarding county expenses for same: <br /> <br /> Section 469.176, Subd. 4h County Costs. (a) Tax increment may be used to pay for <br />the county's actual administrative expenses under sections 469.174 to 469.179 The county may <br />require payment of those expenses by February 15 of the year after the year in which the <br />expenses are incurred. The amount of these payments is not required to be set forth in the tax <br />increment financing plan for the project. To obtain payment for actual administrative costs, the <br />county auditor must submit to the authority a record of costs incurred by the county auditor <br />related to administration of the authority's tax increment financing districts. <br /> <br />For 1991, the City of Ramsey has been charged by Anoka County as follows: <br /> <br />Maintenance costs at $7.11 per parcel and @270.16 per district <br /> for a total of <br />Additional costs - prior year original certification <br />Pay 1991 Anoka County Administrative Costs <br /> <br />$4,998.19 <br /> 1.886.48 <br />$6,884.67 <br /> <br /> Anoka County has identified a total cost of approximately $57,000 in support of tax increment <br /> financing districts, and this cost will be borne by the cities. <br /> Observations: <br /> i The City Administrator and 1 attended a meeting at Anoka County to discuss these charges. <br />· Representatives from other cities in Anoka County also attended this meeting. The meeting <br />~ began and ended on a friendly note with the main discussion focused on how the County had <br /> \ determined the cost. Anoka County included costs for staff, supplies and administrative <br />~ .~expenditures, and when questioned as to what administrative expenses were included - the <br /> ~esponse was primarily the cost of facilities (heat, light, building repair, etc. on a square foot <br /> asis). <br /> While there is no question but the County does incur cost for tax increment reporting, this is <br /> another example of additional costs incurred at the expense of cities. <br /> <br />Committee Action: <br /> <br />None - discussion only. <br /> <br />Review Checklist: <br /> <br />Finance Officer <br />City Administrator <br /> <br />10/29/91 <br /> <br /> <br />