Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Backous introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br />Mayor Strommen <br />Councilmember Backous <br />Councilmember Riley <br />Councilmember Johns <br />Councilmember Kuzma <br />RESOLUTION #14 -02 -035 <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING AN ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT FOR AN <br />EXISTING DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE LOCATED PARTIALLY WITHIN <br />A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT AT 16438 COQUINA ST NW AND <br />DECLARING TERMS OF SAME <br />WHEREAS, Erik C. B. Payeur, hereinafter referred to as the "Applicant," has requested <br />an Encroachment Agreement for an existing detached accessory structure (the "Structure ") that <br />partially encroaches upon a drainage and utility easement (the "Easement ") on the property <br />generally known as 16438 Coquina St NW and legally described as follows: <br />Lot 1, Block 1, OAK RUN <br />(the "Subject Property "). <br />WHEREAS, the City of Ramsey (the "City ") processed an application for and issued a <br />building permit for the Structure in 2003; and <br />WHEREAS, the Structure was to be constructed on the west side of the Easement to avoid <br />any encroachment; and <br />WHEREAS, in January of 2014, through title work for the Subject Property, a partial <br />encroachment of the Easement by the Structure was revealed; and <br />WHEREAS, the City Engineer has found that the Easement can still function with the <br />partial encroachment of the Structure; and <br />WHEREAS, City Council reviewed the request on February 25, 2014. <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br />1. That, contingent upon the Applicant entering into an Encroachment Agreement with the City, <br />the Applicant may continue to maintain the Structure, at its current size and dimensions, in <br />accordance with the terms and conditions contained within the Encroachment Agreement. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />Riley, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />