My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/11/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2014
>
Agenda - Council - 03/11/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:17:57 PM
Creation date
3/14/2014 9:14:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/11/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
293
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Regular Session 4. 10. <br />Meeting Date: 03/11/2014 <br />By: Colleen Lasher, Administrative <br />Services <br />Information <br />Title <br />Adopt Resolution #14-03-058 Approving an M.O.U. for Uniform Stipends with LELS and AFSCME and to <br />Approve a Non -Union Uniform Stipend <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to revise the City's current practices related to how certain employee uniforms are <br />purchased in order to comply with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). This case addresses uniforms that are <br />considered taxable earnings to the employee; taxable to the employee because the clothing item can be considered <br />"adaptable to general usage as ordinarily clothing" (per the IRS). <br />The Finance Department and Human Resources have determined that it is necessary to revise our practices related <br />to some of our Uniform Purchases and Uniform Reimbursements in order to ensure compliance with the IRS. This <br />change primarily impacts employees in the Police Department and Public Works, does not have an impact on the <br />overall budget, and reduces administrative time in the Finance Department. <br />The City negotiated with LELS-Patrol, LELS-Sergeants, and the AFSCME group to come to an agreement based <br />on an unaccountable plan. An unaccountable plan is the least labor intensive plan from an administrative <br />perspective and most desired by employees. The agreement does not have a budgetary impact, but rather changes <br />and simplifies our process. Please see the attached draft M.O.Us. and IRS document (pages 12 and 13) for more <br />information. <br />Police Department: The IRS rules related to the taxability of uniforms depends on the type of uniform. Most public <br />safety uniforms are not taxable and most of the Police Department uniform purchases will not change. I.e., most <br />uniform purchases will continue to be non-taxable and purchased by the Department directly. In most cases, <br />employees will simply continue to be provided with their uniform, as required by Department policy. However, <br />"Class C" uniforms (e.g. office staff uniforms) will no longer be purchased directly by the Department and are <br />considered taxable to the employee. Therefore, the City recommends paying applicable employees directly, via an <br />annual stipend, for purchasing their own Class C uniform. <br />Public Works Department - AFSCME Employees: The AFSCME contract currently provides for uniform <br />reimbursements whereby the respective employee purchases their own uniforms, requests reimbursement from the <br />City via a reimbursement request form and is reimbursed through payroll. This is administratively labor intensive <br />and does not properly tax the employee for the benefit of the uniform. <br />Non Union Employees: There are a handful of Public Works employees that are not covered by the AFSCME <br />contract, yet are required to wear uniforms. This includes the PW Utilities Supervisor, the Park and Street Lead <br />Workers, the Building Maintenance Supervisor, etc. In the Police Department, the Office Supervisor, the Captains, <br />and the Chief are impacted. Previously, these employees would either be provided with their uniform or were <br />reimbursed for their purchases via a reimbursement request; continuing this practice does not comply with the IRS. <br />Therefore, staff recommends providing this group of employees with an annual stipend equal to that of the <br />respective M.O.U. or current contract. <br />Notification: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.