Laserfiche WebLink
designed this collaborative process to allow for a forum for stakeholders to <br />provide feedback in their own words. <br />These comments are intended to be helpful in the development of the rulemaking <br />process, as these are the issues and questions most important to Ramsey's key <br />stakeholders in the corridor. Suggested alternatives range from appropriate <br />language changes in the draft rules to no changes at all. <br />Table 1.1: Overview of Collaborative Process <br />p0,4 , •,,} <br />, <br />�- —. <br />r <br />' *i <br />lop,yrariIicror <br />NW-tuiuRRal- <br />%Ma di'" <br />WVAX Wo6"' <br />MAI N'N <br />6vcAL• <br />LYn1N SAxx�d <br />Kam"+ eRawN <br />Step 1: Convening as a large group <br />Step 2: Scheduling small group sessions <br />— till <br />.- ' <br />Step 3: Convening small group sessions <br />Step 4: Reporting back to the larger <br />group <br />---milli& <br />y. .. o., rersr.q'K+ 1. d.4.,mi. <br />--- -- <br />°j Y e_c\A-k-"ian l tiq' <br />I. rk}arc iand use. o ' <br />l� r h �, r i y , <br />/ <br />A. Lra;.en torcF-.q7.-:" ..4-1- <br />i. P. 1141,113 or 4 , 5 Isrl .1. +o <br />..c.. ��ii / <br />11 - AlliI'Ib J O4• <br />5 De:...5� <br />v 'For haa4. . i.,{{5 <br />.ere-,,,,e,n>oM1+„rt <br />Step 5: Building consensus around topics <br />Step 6: In their own words - Bringing <br />to bring forward to the DNR to discuss <br />forward comments in a transparent <br />further <br />environment and involving stakeholders <br />proactively in the development process <br />DRAFT Statement of Policy — Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (10/29/13) <br />