My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/06/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2014
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/06/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:20:37 AM
Creation date
3/14/2014 9:28:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/06/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Since the Home Occupation standards were last amended, there have been about twenty-four (24) Home <br />Occupation Permit applications processed and of those, they were evenly split between administrative Home <br />Occupations and Home Occupations processed in accordance with the standards for a conditional use permit. <br />Those that qualify as an administrative Home Occupation generally are brought to the City's attention by the <br />applicant rather than through the code enforcement program. The majority of these types of requests involve <br />businesses such as message therapy, photography studios, cosmetology, music instruction, etc. with no exterior <br />evidence of the business and no non-resident employees. These types of Home Occupations typically do not <br />generate concerns from a neighborhood as they are low impact and are fairly inconspicuous. <br />Home Occupations that have been processed in accordance with the provisions for a conditional use permit have <br />more often than not been the result of a complaint filed with the City. These Home Occupations typically have <br />exterior evidence of the business such as commercial vehicles and/or equipment, non-resident employees, and more <br />outside activity than administrative Home Occupations. These Home Occupations are more often related to <br />construction businesses/contractors that have multiple commercial vehicles and/or equipment that are stored on the <br />residential property. These typically are those that are readily seen and/or heard by neighboring property owners. <br />The intent of the Home Occupations Ordinance is to permit home occupations in residential neighborhoods without <br />impacting the peace, quiet, and domestic tranquility of the neighborhood. Furthermore, the standards are intended to <br />guarantee all residents freedom from excessive noise, excessive traffic, nuisance, fire hazard and other possible <br />effects of a home occupation. The difficulty is finding general consensus of what that threshold is that negatively <br />impacts the tranquility of a neighborhood. Does the presence of one (1) commercial vehicle negatively impact the <br />residential setting or can some threshold be identified as generally acceptable before impacting that sense of <br />tranquility? Would property size need to be taken into consideration when assessing this question? <br />Presently, commercial vehicles/equipment can be parked on a residential property if they are stored in accordance <br />with Section 117-355 (Residential Development Off -Street Parking), which requires parking on an improved <br />surface and screening to a degree of fifty or seventy-five percent (50% or 75%) depending on the zoning district. If <br />it is not related to a Home Occupation, than it would not require any review or permit through the City. Staff <br />believes that the intent of this provision was to lawfully permit one (1) commercial vehicle and/or one (1) <br />commercial piece of equipment to be parked outside on a property; however, that is not specified within City Code. <br />It appears that it was intended for those that were able to bring their work vehicle home each night to do so <br />lawfully, as they would only be parked on the property for shorter periods of time. Thus, Staff believes City Code <br />language could be better clarified establishing a limit on the maximum number of commercial vehicles and <br />equipment, thus addressing some of the secondary effects of these complaints. This would appear to be in line with <br />previous Planning Commission recommendations on specific requests in the past and be better in line with the <br />peaceful tranquility of a residential neighborhood. The Planning Commission could also consider altering setbacks <br />for commercials based on feedback the City has received from neighboring properties of approved Home <br />Occupation Permits. <br />In addition to setbacks, another tool or mechanism that could be reviewed/implemented is a property size threshold. <br />Presently, City Code does utilize three (3) acres as the threshold between being allowed one (1) non-resident <br />employee versus three (3) non-resident employees. However, a similar threshold could be considered related to <br />whether there could be any exterior evidence of a home occupation at all. Or, another consideration may be whether <br />below a certain property size, there be a specific limit of how many commercial vehicles and commercial pieces of <br />equipment could be stored outside on a property. <br />Attached to this case are ordinances from adjacent and nearby communities related to Home Occupations. Also, <br />Staff has compiled a list of existing definitions that seem relevant to this discussion as well. Finally, Section <br />117-351 (Home Occupations) is also attached for review of current standards. <br />Funding Source: <br />Review of the Home Occupation Ordinance is being handled as part of normal Staff duties. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.