Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Planning Commission <br />Meeting Date: 01/09/2014 <br />By: Tim Gladhill, Community Development <br />5. 1. <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Review Sketch Plan of O'Shaughnessy Addition Located at 17201 Saint Francis Boulevard NW, Case of Tim <br />O'Shaughnessy <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The City has received an Application for Minor Plat to allow a lot split of the property generally known as 17201 <br />Saint Francis Boulevard. The request does not create a new buildable lot, but does separate a nineteen (19) acre <br />outlot from the larger thirty-seven (37) acre lot. The request also facilitates the construction of a new primary <br />residential dwelling. The site was previously the location of a landscape nursery and tree farm. <br />Notification: <br />The City attempted to notify all Property Owners within 700 feet of the Minor Plat of the Sketch Plan Review via <br />Standard US Mail. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />The request is a simple lot split that does not create a new buildable lot (no net increase in buildable lots). The <br />request facilitates the construction of a new single-family home (the existing primary structure will become an <br />accessory structure to the new primary dwelling). The net effect will be a twenty (20) acre buildable lot and <br />seventeen (17) acre outlot. The outlot is anticipated to be considered for rural residential development sometime in <br />the future. The size of the outlot would facilitate some form of future subdivision, consistent with applicable zoning <br />regulations in effect at that time. <br />The buildable area is sufficient to facilitate the desired development as single-family residential, meeting all <br />minimum standards of City Code. More detailed analysis will be completed administratively as part of the standard <br />development review process for individual single-family homes. <br />The request is subject to review and approval by the Minnesota Department of Transportation, as it is adjacent to <br />Trunk Highway 47, with utilization of existing access. <br />Alternatives <br />Alternative # 1 - Direct the Applicant to proceed to Final Plat. As it appears that all minimum standards are able to <br />be met, this is Staffs recommended action. <br />Alternative #2 - Direct the Applicant to modify the Sketch Plan before proceeding to Final Plat. Staff has not <br />identified any deficiencies in the request, and therefore does not recommend this alternative. <br />Alternative #3 - Recommend that the City Council deny the Plat. Based on the information available at this time, <br />Staff does not recommend this alternative. <br />Funding Source: <br />All costs associated with processing the Application are the responsibility of the Applicant. <br />Recommendation: <br />