Laserfiche WebLink
particulates prior to exhausting to the exterior of the building. All three (3) of the range manufacturers that Total <br />Defense is considering suggest that the ventilation/exhaust system be equipped with HEPA filtration, which <br />captures the particulates prior to exhausting to the exterior of the building. Staff incorporated that standard into the <br />draft Zoning Amendment that is being considered this evening as well. <br />As with any proposed use, the indoor shooting range will need to comply with Chapter 30 (Nuisances) of City <br />Code, including the acceptable sound levels. Sound is measured in decibels and the readings would need to be made <br />at the property of where the sound is being heard, not where it is generated. This would be applicable to not only the <br />firing of guns within the indoor shooting range but also to the mechanical ventilation system as well. <br />There are at least seventy-one (71) parking stalls on the Subject Property, based on a review of aerial photographs. <br />In determining the minimum required parking for the proposed use, Staff based the calculation entirely on a retail <br />use (one space per 200 square feet of retail floor space). However, a large portion of the square footage of the <br />building is excluded in the calculation as there would not be any persons within the shooting lanes themselves. A <br />minimum of fifty (50) parking stalls must be maintained for the proposed use on the Subject Property, which does <br />include the second bay, should it be constructed in the future. <br />As of the writing of this case, Staff has received two comments on the proposed use (both of which are attached). <br />One supports the proposed use as long as all safety standards are met. The second is from an adjacent property <br />owner concerned about potential impacts to one of his tenants, a child care center. Staff has reviewed state statutes <br />and is not aware of any standard or requirement that would prohibit an indoor shooting range in close proximity to a <br />child care center (although per State Statute 609.66 [Dangerous Weapons], it is unlawful for any person to <br />knowingly possess, store or keep a dangerous weapon while knowingly on school property and a licensed child <br />care center qualifies as school property for the purposes of that Statute). Staff did hand deliver a notice of the public <br />hearing and open house to the child care center on December 31, 2013. <br />Alternatives/Options <br />Option # 1: Recommend approval of the conditional use permit to operate an indoor shooting range on the Subject <br />Property. The concept of an indoor shooting range was reviewed by the Planning Commission in January of 2013. <br />The response at that time was mostly positive as this unique type of use might help draw traffic and new business <br />to this struggling retail node. Additionally, nearby property owners that participated in a collaborative public <br />process held in September of 2013 identified a shooting range as a desirable use for this site. There are standards in <br />City Code to address noise, odors, and minimum parking requirements and the Building Code, Mechanical Code <br />and Fire Codes have standards for the design and construction of indoor shooting ranges as well as for the storage, <br />handling, sale or use of ammunition. Additionally, proposed use would be essentially in a building within a <br />building, which should provide enhanced containment of both bullets and noise. Staff supports this option <br />contingent upon the B-1 General Business district being amended to identify indoor commercial recreation as a <br />conditional use. <br />Option #2: After reviewing the proposed conditional use permit and receiving input from the public hearing, <br />identify additional conditions and/or findings related to the request and direct Staff to either incorporate those <br />revisions prior to presenting the information to City Council or bring the revised documents back for Planning <br />Commission review at a subsequent meeting. <br />Option #3: Recommend denial of the request. Based on the desire to see expanded uses in this retail node, the input <br />received from the collaborative public process related to this retail node, and feedback received previously from the <br />Planning Commission, Staff does not support this option. <br />Funding Source: <br />All costs associated with this request are the responsibility of the Applicant. <br />Recommendation: <br />