Laserfiche WebLink
conversely, a historic structure, such as the barn in the above example, could not be disqualified from <br />consideration because it was not adjacent to a particular Federal -aid facility, as long as some other <br />relationship to surface transportation could be established. <br />It is not necessary to have a TE activity function as an active transportation facility, either past or <br />current, to qualify as an eligible TE activity. For example, a scenic or historic site may have a <br />relationship to transportation but not function as a transportation facility. <br />Once a relationship to surface transportation is established, TE activities can be implemented in a <br />number of ways. For example, they can be developed as parts of larger joint development projects, or <br />as stand-alone projects. <br />RESPONSE: <br />This proposed trail project is itself a surface transportation project that will expand the modes <br />of surface transportation possible in this corridor by providing a trail for pedestrians and <br />bicyclists where none exists today. The Mississippi River Regional Trail implements qualifying <br />activity #1 - provision of facilities for pedestrians and bicyclists. The construction of this <br />segment will complete Metropolitan Council, and Anoka County's Mississippi River Regional <br />Trail from the City of Minneapolis in Hennepin County to the City of Elk River in Sherburne <br />County. <br />4. The project must be included in, be part of, or address a transportation problem or need identified in <br />one of the following: 1) an approved local or county comprehensive plan found to be consistent with <br />Metropolitan Council plans; 2) a locally approved capital improvement program; 3) an officially <br />adopted corridor study (trunk highway studies must be approved by Mn/DOT and Metropolitan <br />Council); or 4) the official plan or program of the applicant agency. It also must not conflict with the <br />goals and policies in these adopted regional plans; the 2030 Transportation Policy Plan (2010), the <br />2030 Regional Framework (2004), and the 2030 Regional Parks Policy Plan (2010). The applicant <br />must reference the appropriate comprehensive plan, CIP, approved corridor study document, or other <br />plan or program and provide copies of the applicable pages. <br />RESPONSE: <br />This trail project is a segment of the Mississippi River Regional Trail, which was designated as <br />a Regional Trail by the Metropolitan Council in 2006 when adopting the Regional Trails Policy <br />Amendment to its Regional Recreation Open Space Development Guidelines/Policy Plan. This <br />trail has been adopted by both the City of Ramsey and Anoka County in their 2030 <br />Comprehensive Plans, which were updated in 2008. Copies of the applicable pages from each <br />plan have been provided in Appendix 2. <br />The proposed Mississippi River Regional Trail is consistent with the goals and policies in <br />adopted regional plans. As identified in the 2030 Transportation Policy Plan, the proposed <br />project seeks to develop a regional multi -use trail to serve the needs of both pedestrians and <br />bicyclists. The project involves interjurisdictional coordination as the project involves right-of- <br />way from the City of Ramsey, Anoka County and MnDOT. The project strives to be cost- <br />effective through the use of existing right-of-way as much as possible. <br />5. Typically a transportation project involves mitigation, work in addition to immediate construction <br />activities, that is negotiated with permitting agencies and local governments as a condition of <br />obtaining permit approval. Activities that are normally part of the mitigation of a transportation <br />project are not eligible, such as required stormwater mitigation or basic bicycle and pedestrian <br />accommodation on bridges to be constructed or reconstructed. <br />12 <br />