My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Rivlyn Avenue
>
Comprehensive Plan
>
Rivyln Avenue Amendment
>
Rivlyn Avenue
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2014 12:42:55 PM
Creation date
5/6/2014 10:58:38 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
been talk about possible redevelopment and roads, but no further discussion has taken place on <br />that. <br />Chairperson Nixt indicated that it is apparent they are not going to resolve this tonight, and he <br />would like staff to make a list of the errors on the maps. <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon clarified that the road issue raised by Ms. Tersteeg is different than <br />the Comprehensive Plan changes. <br />A short recess was called at 9:53 p.m. Chairperson Nixt reconvened the meeting at 9:55 p.m. <br />Mandy Jensen, 6211 Rivlyn Avenue, asked what her lot is zoned today. <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon indicated today it is single - family R1, however the Comprehensive <br />Plan shows it as industrial. <br />Ms. Jensen asked what the next step will be. <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon indicated the City does not have any plans at this time, but there have <br />been discussions that this may be an area for redevelopment in the future. <br />Francis Welte, 16051 Alpine Street, stated she was here concerning her property as a business. <br />She stated they are grandfathered now, and if the City is re- zoning everything between Hwy 10 <br />and the railroad track to B2, why are they not re- zoning her property to make it conforming. <br />Consultant Gordon stated this was a good point, and he thinks they should take it under <br />advisement. <br />Mr. Hanson indicated there are many uses not listed anywhere; theatres and performance arts <br />establishments, video rental stores, to name a few. He asked that staff review the list. He stated <br />his other issue was on the public hearing. Since the information sent to the public was incorrect, <br />the City will need to send out another map and hold another public hearing. <br />Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Commissioner Reeve, to close the public hearing at <br />10:07 p.m. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Reeve, Brauer, Van Scoy and <br />Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Johnson and Shepherd. <br />Chairperson Nixt suggested identifying areas on the map with an error or omission and re- <br />notifying property owners within 700 feet of those areas. <br />Chairperson Nixt moved to retract the motion to close the public hearing, and moved to continue <br />the public hearing. Commissioner Reeve seconded the motion. <br />Planning Commission/May 1, 2003 <br />Page 15 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.