My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 02/18/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2000 - 2009
>
2003
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 02/18/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 2:11:19 PM
Creation date
4/28/2003 2:31:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
02/18/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
P.W. CASE # <br /> <br />CONSIDER STREET WIDTHS IN NEW SUBDIVISIONS <br /> By: Steven J. Jankowski, City Engineer <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />The Village of Sunfish Lake Planned Unit Development (PUD) has proposed street <br />widths which fall below the City's residential street standard. Discussion of this proposal <br />should begin with a review of the rational behind the City's current width standards. <br />Ideally, an urban residential street might provide space for parking on both sides and <br />through traffic in both directions. A typical traffic through lane is generally designed to <br />be 12 feet wide. On street parking lanes varies between 6 to 9 feet. Figure A represents <br />an ideal cross-section for a residential City street and illustrates a requirement of 42 feet <br />from back of curb to back of curb. Realizing that the ideal section illustrated in Figure A <br />does have adverse environmental and social impacts, the current City standard has sealed <br />back the width demands from this idealized section. Figure B represents the current City <br />standards. Reducing three feet from the travel lanes and two feet from the parking lanes <br />is a significant compression over that of the idealized street section. This standard <br />functions satisfactorily because of the fact that parking on both sides of the street is a <br />relatively infrequent event, and free parking lanes give flexibility to the street use. <br /> <br />With the proposal by the developer to prohibit parking on one side of each residential <br />street, Staff would be supportive of reducing the street section to 28 feet wide as <br />illustrated in Figure C. The difference from current City sections is the elimination of a <br />six-foot parking lane, and an increase in one foot in each traffic lane. The increase in <br />travel lane width is deemed necessary to compensate for the loss of flexibility provided <br />by the second parking lane. During winter months snow is plowed only to the gutter line. <br />Furthermore during snowy periods, high snow banks result in the loss of up to several <br />feet along the pavement edge and vehicles tend to park farther into the street to allow <br />passengers to exit the vehicle. These conditions were observed to some degree during the <br />recent bus trip to Liberty on the Lake in Stillwater. <br /> <br />The developer is also proposing to have one way streets with parking restricted on both <br />sides. This will occur in two locations, on the main entry street and on the eastern street <br />with a large green space separating northbound and southbound traffic. Since all <br />additional lanes have been eliminated, there is no flexibility left in the roadway section. <br />Careful consideration must be given for emergency situations, including snow, disabled <br />vehicles, road repairs, etc. Staff supports a road width of 20 feet, which provides a six- <br />foot area for emergencies. <br /> <br />It should be noted that all of the sections shown illustrates the use of surmountable curb <br />which extends one foot beyond the flow line of the gutter. The recommended street <br />section may be further reduced by using straight-back curb in place of surmountable. <br />Since the width of the curb back is six inches for straight-back curb, a one-half foot <br />reduction may take for each curbline replaced with straight-back curb. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.