My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 05/20/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2010 - 2019
>
2014
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 05/20/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 10:39:02 AM
Creation date
5/28/2014 11:42:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
05/20/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 have considered the issues associated with the installation ea sidewalk along the north and <br />east sides of Andric Street and 164 Lane in association with a street reconstruction work on <br />these streets. 1 want the City Council to know that 1 am: <br />iVly property is cal thy;: <br />Oti.:r t: ornments: <br />, 1 , <br />k i P L e <br />In support o #'a sidewalk in this location <br />In opposition or a sidewalk in his location <br />Undecided or nquiral on this i,w,te <br />�.ast or north <br />I■v -,,ti, <br />I have considered the issues associated with the installation or a sidewalk along the north and , <br />e sides or Andric Street and 1.60' Lan, in association with a street reconstruction work on <br />these streets. l want the City Council to know that I am: <br />In support of a sidewalk in this location <br />It opposition or ,a sidewalk in this location <br />Undecided or neutral Oil this issue <br />Other Comments: <br />west or south side cat 'the street. <br />REC'D JAN 2 9 2009 <br />My property is on the: V east or north west or south side or the street. <br />We know of many neighbors that were pressured and /or mislead so much by the homeowners' assn, that they signed <br />the opinion surveys in direct opposition to their true opinions. Anyone knowing the facts is left with one logical choice — <br />do the sidewalks now. The goals of Ramsey (and their plans for Northfork) Include installation of walkways at some <br />time; installing them now would cost less (overall costs will increase in the future, and certain things would have to be <br />paid for two times - lawns, sprinkler, etc.); installing them now will mean zero additional cost the homeowners; there <br />will be less inconvenience to the community having roadwork and sidewalks done at t(ie same time; it is safer to walk <br />on a sidewalk than on a roadway; Pualic safety should ae our government's main objective — from that standpoint, there <br />can be no argument. People who arf;ue that it is fiscally irresponsible to spend money on this improvement, are <br />forgetting that money will be spent on these walkways at some point, and that at that time the money could come from <br />their checking accounts instead of MSA funds! <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.