Laserfiche WebLink
5. Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) <br />6. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) - Fill in floodplain (assumed previous mining activities) <br />7. Suggestions of overall area redevelopment potential <br />8. Coordination with City of Anoka (discussions are ongoing) <br />The site is impacted by the Highway 10 Access Planning Study currently initiated by the Minnesota Department of <br />Transportation (Mn/DOT). Initial alternatives for frontage road systems would have been in conflict with the <br />proposed plat. However, Mn/DOT, and its consulting engineer Bolton and Menk, Inc., are currently working on <br />alternatives that address comments by this Property Owner, but surrounding Property Owners as well. This <br />planning study will not be complete until later this summer. It is anticipated that the Access Planning Study can <br />work around the current sketch plan concept, although there is not a clear consensus among area property owners <br />on a preferred alternative. <br />The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed Sketch Plan at their April4, 2014 Regular Meeting. Opposition <br />to the proposed Sketch Plan was submitted on behalf of Lano Equipment, located immediately adjacent to the <br />Property and along Highway 10. Lano Equipment expressed two (2) areas of concern (paraphrased): <br />1. Compatibility of uses and lack of transition area between land use types <br />2. Potential outcomes of the Highway 10 Access Planning Study set to be completed in June, 2014 <br />The Planning Commission generally shared these same concerns. As such, the Planning Commission directed the <br />Applicant to postpone further review of the proposed Plat until after the completion of the Highway 10 Access <br />Study. The Planning Commission did not feel that it had adequate micro -level details to exercise their legislative <br />capacity to amend the Comprehensive Plan until Highway 10 Access Study alternatives were adopted and it had a <br />better understanding of appropriate land uses of the surrounding area. In other words, the Planning Commission <br />desires to look at the land use of this node holistically, rather than just the Subject Property. Additionally, the <br />Planning Commission recommended that the City initiate a small area planning effort similar to the existing small <br />area plan processes. <br />The intent of discussing with the Public Works Committee at this time is to discuss any potential role in facilitating <br />or recommending land uses in a future process, if necessary. Discussion at the Planning Commission included <br />previous redevelopment discussions in this general area. The output of the Planning Commission recommended <br />process could result un adjustments to the Future Land Use Map, yet to be defined. Addition of this effort to the <br />Community Development Department's work plan will require re -prioritization and shifting of resources to a certain <br />degree, as this effort is not currently identified in the Comprehensive Plan, Strategic Plan, nor 2014 Budget. The <br />Applicant could choose to expand its Application to include the above to allow this process to proceed to meet its <br />desired timeframe. Staff will forward the minutes of the April3, 2014 Planning Commission Meeting as soon as <br />practically available. <br />The Applicant could choose to proceed forward to Preliminary Plat, but the Planning Commission's formal <br />recommendation is likely to follow the above. <br />PSD Parcel <br />PSD, LLC is working with a potential end user/developer for two (2) larger parcels south of Highway 10 at <br />Traprock Street. One of these parcels was the location of the former Diamonds Bar and Grill. PSD has expressed <br />concern with Ramsey Boulevard Concepts #2 & #4 as a potential conflict with future development scenarios. <br />Although this comment has been submitted to the Study Group, Staff has agreed to take this comment to the Public <br />Works Committee for closer discussion as the Property Owner is apparently in active real estate negotiations that <br />have an impact to these concepts. <br />Funding Source: <br />Specific to Village Bank's proposal, all costs associated with processing the Application are the responsibility of the <br />Applicant. <br />