Laserfiche WebLink
Alternative 2: Recommend City Council deny the proposed Site Plan. There are no deficiencies with the proposal as <br />it relates to City Code. Staff will continue to work with the applicant to ensure that the grading, utility and tree <br />preservation plans meet the intent of City Code and thus, Staff would not support this option. <br />Funding Source: <br />All costs associated with processing the application are the responsibility of the Applicant. <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends approval of the Site Plan contingent upon compliance with the Staff Review File dated April 14, <br />2014 and execution of a Development Permit. <br />Action: <br />Motion to recommend that City Council approve the Site Plan contingent upon compliance with the Staff Review <br />File dated April 14, 2014 and execution of a Development Permit. <br />Site Location Map <br />Site Plan <br />Draft Development Permit <br />Staff Review File Dated April 14, 2014 <br />Attachments <br />Form Review <br />Inbox Reviewed By Date <br />Tim Gladhill Kathy Schmitz 04/24/2014 12:23 PM <br />Form Started By: Chris Anderson Started On: 04/24/2014 08:49 AM <br />Final Approval Date: 04/24/2014 <br />