My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 05/05/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Environmental Policy Board
>
2014
>
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 05/05/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 12:05:41 PM
Creation date
5/28/2014 2:29:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Environmental Policy Board
Document Date
05/05/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Soil Summary <br />• The 4" Spec'd soil is almost doubly effective in soil moisture retaintion than the 4" <br />Borrow soil used in the study, and probably more than doubly effective than topsoil <br />typically availible for redistribution on lots in 'new' developments. <br />• A municipal utility resident can expect to save $74 dollars each year utilizing Spec'd <br />topsoil. <br />• There are other benefits to specified topsoil (like reduced fertilization), that are not <br />accounted for in this report. <br />• Specifying topsoil may be an important strategy for receiving permits for new <br />municipal wells. Additionally, the report demonstrates that up to three (3) municipal <br />wells will not be needed from today to 2040 as a result of requiring specified topsoil. <br />Recommendations: <br />Staff recomends that the revised MnDOT Spec of Common Topsoil Borrow 3877 -1 would be <br />deemed an approved equal to the soil specification presently identified within City Code, until <br />such time as an Ordinace amendment may be executed. <br />Further, that alternatives to specified topsoil for water conservation be explored and <br />approved, such that homeowners and developers may have choices that best meet their goals - <br />while maintaining the interests of the water utility and enviromental conservation. Examples <br />of these measures may include: a 'tool kit' for developers describing the cost benefits to <br />minimizing grading and preserving tree cover, approved irrigation systems with soil moisture <br />sensing technology, alternative landscapes with appropriate measures to ensure conversion to <br />turfgrass does not 'undo' the conservation intent, etc. <br />Next Steps: <br />• Present findings to the Environmental Policy Board at their regular May meeting. <br />• Develop a Conservation Tool Kit for developers to demonstrate potential cost savings <br />by incorporating conservation design practices into projects. <br />• Present findings and Conservation Tool Kit to City Council for further direction. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.