Laserfiche WebLink
to the proposed Sketch Plan was submitted on behalf of Lano Equipment, located immediately adjacent to the <br />Property and along Highway 10. Lano Equipment expressed two (2) areas of concern (paraphrased): <br />1. Compatibility of uses and lack of transition area between land use types <br />2. Potential outcomes of the Highway 10 Access Planning Study set to be completed in June, 2014 <br />The Planning Commission generally shared these same concerns. As such, the Planning Commission directed the <br />Applicant to postpone further review of the proposed Plat until after the completion of the Highway 10 Access <br />Study. The Planning Commission did not feel that it had adequate micro -level details to exercise their legislative <br />capacity to amend the Comprehensive Plan until Highway 10 Access Study alternatives were adopted and it had a <br />better understanding of appropriate land uses of the surrounding area. In other words, the Planning Commission <br />desires to look at the land use of this node holistically, rather than just the Subject Property. Additionally, the <br />Planning Commission recommended that the City initiate a small area planning effort similar to the existing small <br />area plan processes. <br />The intent of discussing with the EDA at this time is to discuss any potential EDA role in facilitating or <br />recommending land uses in a future process, if necessary. Discussion at the Planning Commission included <br />previous redevelopment discussions in this general area. The output of the Planning Commission recommended <br />process could result un adjustments to the Future Land Use Map, yet to be defined. Addition of this effort to the <br />Community Development Department's work plan will require re -prioritization and shifting of resources to a certain <br />degree, as this effort is not currently identified in the Comprehensive Plan, Strategic Plan, nor 2014 Budget. The <br />Applicant could choose to expand its Application to include the above to allow this process to proceed to meet its <br />desired timeframe. Staff will forward the minutes of the April3, 2014 Planning Commission Meeting as soon as <br />practically available. <br />The Applicant could choose to proceed forward to Preliminary Plat, but the Planning Commission's formal <br />recommendation is likely to follow the above. <br />Funding Source: <br />All costs associated with processing the Application are the responsibility of the Applicant. <br />Recommendation: <br />Based on Planning Commission review thus far, there is no recommendation on the request for Sketch Plan Review <br />itself at this time. The Planning Commission recommends that the City take no action on any Comprehensive Plan <br />Amendment until the Highway 10 Access Planning Study and a City -initiated small area planning effort of some <br />degree are completed. <br />Action: <br />Based on discussion. Potential motions to establish a recommendation on the following could be made. <br />1. Postponement of any action on a Comprehensive Plan Amendment until Highway 10 Access Planning Study <br />is complete <br />2. Initiation of a Small Area Planning and Citizen Engagement effort <br />Attachments <br />Site Location Map <br />Proposed Sketch Plan <br />Technical Review File <br />Response from Lano Equipment <br />Form Review <br />Inbox Reviewed By Date <br />