My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Charter Commission - 04/23/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Charter Commission
>
2014
>
Agenda - Charter Commission - 04/23/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 1:17:40 PM
Creation date
5/28/2014 2:44:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Charter Commission
Document Date
04/23/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
fee would be a method to improve the roads with the franchise fee rather than billing the <br />residents $1,700,000 in year one for road improvements. <br />Commissioner Zaetsch compared this draft Ordinance to a moratorium. <br />Commissioner Deemer questioned if the Commission would like to send their suggestions to the <br />City Council to receive their input or whether to move forward on the Niska amendment. <br />Chairperson Field confirmed that the Niska amendment could not be combined into the proposed <br />Ordinance. <br />Commissioner Zaetsch stated that he is in agreement with the proposed Ordinance, which the <br />exception that the title be listed as a moratorium. <br />Commissioner Sivertson questioned if it would be appropriate to state that the Niska amendment <br />would go into effect after the five -year period. <br />Chairperson Field reviewed the aspects that the Charter Commission desired that were built into <br />the proposed Ordinance. He noted that the City Council could move forward with the Ordinance <br />as originally proposed, but the Council did come back with the limitations in order to assuage the <br />concerns of the Charter Commission. <br />Commissioner Deemer questioned if another section could be added that would specify that the <br />Niska amendment would go into effect after the five -year period expires. He noted that if the <br />item is not approved 100 percent by the City Council, the issue would come back again. <br />Commissioner Anderson noted that there is one Councilmember that has stated that they would <br />not vote for franchise fees for this use, and therefore the vote would not be unanimous. She <br />questioned if the City is prohibited from having a road fund. <br />City Attorney Langel advised that the City is not prohibited from having a road fund but cannot <br />have a road utility fee. He explained that this is a franchise fee, which this City is willing to <br />designate for road improvements. <br />Chairperson Field suggested approving the language as proposed with the addition of the Niska <br />amendment becoming effective after the five -year period terminates. <br />Commissioner Zaetsch suggested that the motion be specified to state that the City Attorney draft <br />language in accordance with the discussion tonight to include the title change to "assessment <br />moratorium ". <br />Chairperson Field noted that there is a limit specified that would not allow for additional <br />franchise fees during this five -year period because of the 20 percent limit. <br />Commissioner Niska stated that he would be okay with sending this back to the City Council as <br />discussed tonight to determine what their input is. He still believed that the ability to use this <br />Charter Commission/ January 27, 2014 <br />Page 7 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.