|
The following table presents five years of comparative operating results for each of the City's utility
<br />enterprise funds:
<br />Utility enterprise funds
<br />Water
<br />Operating revenue
<br />Operating expenses
<br />Operating income
<br />2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
<br />Operating income as a %
<br />of operating revenue 23.7 % 20.7 % 25.4 % 42.4 % 35.3 %
<br />Sewer
<br />Operating revenue
<br />Operating expenses
<br />$ 1,693,581 $ 1,633,461 $ 1,821,386 $ 2,131,460 $ 1,997,302
<br />1,291,952 1,295,721 1,358,050 1,228,012 1,293,201
<br />$ 401,629 $ 337,740 $ 463,336 $ 903,448 $ 704,101
<br />$ 1,214,953 $ 1,261,609 $ 1,236,771 $ 1,324,342 $ 1,341,674
<br />1,076,451 1,101,554 1,149,318 1,152,760 1,190,551
<br />Operating income $ 138,502 $ 160,055 $ 87,453 $ 171,582 $ 151,123
<br />Operating income as a %
<br />of operating revenue 11.4 % 12.7 % 7.1 % 13.0 % 11.3 %
<br />Street Light
<br />Operating revenue $ 172,897 $ 179,272 $ 178,850 $ 179,124 $ 177,158
<br />Operating expenses 148,140 158,369 163,758 165,651 176,736
<br />Operating income $ 24,757 $ 20,903 $ 15,092 $ 13,473 $ 422
<br />Operating income as a %
<br />of operating revenue 14.3 % 11.7 % 8.4 % 7.5 % 0.2 %
<br />Recycling
<br />Operating revenue $ 284,515 $ 294,617 $ 297,226 $ 296,358 $ 298,034
<br />Operating expenses 298,631 307,662 302,947 302,936 308,629
<br />Operating income (loss) $ (14,116) $ (13,045) $ (5,721) $ (6,578) $ (10,595)
<br />Operating income as a %
<br />of operating revenue (5.0) % (4.4) % (1.9) % (2.2) % (3.6) %
<br />Storm Water
<br />Operating revenue $ 578,666 $ 617,598 $ 617,579 $ 647,169 $ 677,936
<br />Operating expenses 358,522 350,521 410,666 496,309 491,370
<br />Operating income $ 220,144 $ 267,077 $ 206,913 $ 150,860 $ 186,566
<br />Operating income as a %
<br />of operating revenue 38.0 % 43.2 % 33.5 % 23.3 % 27.5 %
<br />As displayed in the table above, each of the individual enterprise funds was able to report positive
<br />operating results for the year ended December 31, 2013, with the exception of the Recycling Fund. This
<br />loss was covered by the County Recycling Grant which typically subsidizes these operations.
<br />The most significant change in operating income results compared to prior year occurred in the Water
<br />Utility Fund. The decrease in Water Utility Fund operating income was due to a decrease in water
<br />consumption as s a result of a late winter and wet summer compared to 2012, while water rates remained
<br />the same as prior year. Water Utility Fund operating expense increases for personal service, supplies,
<br />service charges, and depreciation also contributed to the decrease in operating income compared to the
<br />prior year.
<br />-13-
<br />
|