My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 06/10/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2014
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 06/10/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:20:18 PM
Creation date
6/11/2014 10:32:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
06/10/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
230
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LEGISLATIVE UPDATES <br />Despite an improving economy, the 2013 Legislature faced the familiar prospect of having to address a <br />significant projected deficit in order to adopt a balanced budget for the next biennium. The November <br />2012 financial forecast projected a deficit of $1.1 billion in the state General Fund for the 2014 -2015 <br />biennium, which was revised down to a $627 million deficit in the February 2013 forecast. Even with this <br />challenge, there was an expectation that with one political party holding the Governor's office and <br />majorities in both the House and Senate, this biennial budget agreement would be reached more quickly <br />and easily than the previous one, which featured numerous vetoes, a special session, and the longest <br />shutdown of non - essential state government services in Minnesota history. While in the end there was no <br />special session or government shutdown, the 2013 session still stretched until the final day allowable <br />under the state constitution, with the last bill passed at midnight. <br />The following is a summary of recent legislative activity affecting the finances of Minnesota cities in <br />2013 and into the future: <br />Local Government Aid (LGA) — The state -wide LGA appropriation for fiscal 2013 was set to <br />increase about 2.8 percent to $426.4 million However, the 2012 Legislature froze 2013 LGA <br />payments at 2012 levels for cities with a population of 5,000 or more. For cities with populations <br />below 5,000, 2013 LGA was the greater of their 2012 aid or the amount they would have received for <br />2013 under existing law. <br />The 2013 Legislature completely overhauled the LGA formula for fiscal year 2014 and thereafter, <br />creating a three - tiered formula that includes separate "need factor" calculations for cities with <br />populations under 2,500, between 2,500 and 10,000, or over 10,000. The new formula simplifies the <br />LGA calculation, and is designed to reduce the volatility of the LGA distribution by limiting the <br />amount it may decline in a given year. Under the new formula, each city's LGA distribution for 2014 <br />will be no less than their 2013 LGA. Beginning in 2015, any reduction to a city's LGA distribution <br />will be limited to the lesser of $10 per capita, or 5 percent of their previous year net tax levy. For <br />cities that gain under the new formula, the increases will be distributed proportionate to their unmet <br />need, as determined by the new "need factor" calculations. The state -wide LGA appropriation is <br />$507.6 million for fiscal 2014, $509.1 million for 2015, and $511 6 million for fiscal 2016 and <br />thereafter. <br />Levy Limits — A levy limit for city property tax levies payable in 2014 was established for all cities <br />with populations exceeding 2,500. The levy limit base is the certified levy (excluding special levies) <br />plus the certified LGA for taxes payable in fiscal 2012 or 2013, whichever is greater, increased by 3 <br />percent. The levy limit is equal to the base, less the city's certified LGA for fiscal 2014. Levies for <br />special purposes such as debt service, abatements, or voter - approved purposes, are not subject to this <br />limitation. <br />Market Value Definitions — A number of levy, tax, spending, debt, and similar limits that had <br />previously been computed based on "market value" or "taxable market value" must now be computed <br />based on "estimated market value." This change was enacted to eliminate the effects of the homestead <br />market value exclusion established in 2011. <br />Levy Authority for Watershed Management Plan — Cites are granted the authority to levy taxes <br />to provide funding for the implementation of a comprehensive watershed management plan. <br />Tax Status of Leased Tax - Exempt Property — Tax - exempt property owned by a political <br />subdivision and held under a lease for a term of at least one year, or under a contract for the purchase <br />thereof, is considered to be the property of the person holding it for all purposes of taxation. This <br />change makes the tax treatment of leased property owned by local governments consistent with leased <br />property owned by the federal government. <br />-16- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.