My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 06/10/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2014
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 06/10/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:20:18 PM
Creation date
6/11/2014 10:32:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
06/10/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
230
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
issue is not a major concern. Primarily, the joint services effort shares administrative expenses, and results in some <br />capital, operational, and coverage advantages. The Mississippi River, Rum River, and Highway 10 create some <br />operational barriers with the other communities, but those barriers have been overcome by Anoka - Champlin, for <br />example (again, manpower and equipment in each City). In Elk River, the distances and multi - county service area, <br />are potential issues, but again, nothing that couldn't be overcome, with willing partners. Note, fire service is <br />dispatched through the county system. <br />Other points to consider: <br />• Ramsey, Anoka, and Champlin discussed a merger back in mid to late 80's, Ramsey decided to move ahead <br />on its own. <br />• Elk River is currently dealing with three different counties and has contracts with two other communities, and <br />have not expressed interest in merging with Ramsey <br />• Oak Grove initiated a shared services discussion in the 2005 -2007 time frame. That effort failed, and no cities <br />decided to move ahead. <br />Finally, a goal of the joint fire services group, since the beginning, has been to keep the door open for other <br />interested communities. To date, the four communities currently in the process are the only ones that have shown <br />interest. <br />Timeframe: <br />Funding Source: <br />This is for discussion only. Depending on Council direction, a case will be brought to a regular council meeting for <br />action. <br />Responsible Party(ies): <br />Outcome: <br />Staff is looking for direction on how this process is to proceed. The issues mentioned above including governance, <br />cost sharing will be addressed in a draft JPA document. Other detailed questions such as City "weighted" <br />decision - making has been brought up, and the study group agrees this must be addressed in an equitable manner via <br />the draft JPA document. <br />Press Release <br />Study Group Final Report <br />Resolution May 12 -05 -075 <br />Resolution 13 -08 -133 <br />Cost Share Model <br />Attachments <br />Form Review <br />Inbox Reviewed By Date <br />Kurt Ulrich Kurt Ulrich 06/05/2014 08:45 AM <br />Form Started By: Jo Thieling Started On: 05/29/2014 09:49 AM <br />Final Approval Date: 06/05/2014 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.