Laserfiche WebLink
sidewalks are identified but she does not see this in the cottage area and for safety reasons, she <br />would like to see sidewalks along these. <br /> <br />Mr. Kangus stated he would like a recommendation from the Commission tonight in order to <br />continue with making the new drawings. <br /> <br />Commissioner Ostrum stated the reason they are so cautious regarding this, is because they have <br />been promised things in the past and it has not occurred. <br /> <br />The Commission recommended that sidewalks be identified in the cottage area and to maximize <br />the tree preservation and that the developer come with the recreational amenities clearly <br />identified. <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos stated they need to start to lay out a frame work to where park <br />dedication fees be directed to. <br /> <br />Commissioner Ostrum stated he would like to wait on this but have staff make recommendation <br />regarding this at the next meeting. <br /> <br />Commissioner Rolfe asked where the rounded trail came from. <br /> <br />Mr. Kangus stated the trail was the developer's idea. <br /> <br />Commissioner Rolfe stated that if they place a trail along the perimeter, they will be losing trees <br />everywhere except along the back area of the development. He stated he does not see any benefit <br />to anyone with a perimeter trail except to the development. <br /> <br />Mr. Kangus stated they are proposing to go into the fringe area and identify all the trees. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olds asked if there would be any benefit shifting the sidewalk on the east side to <br />push the boulevard back. <br /> <br />Mr. Kangus stated they could explore this but does not know the answer to this. <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos reviewed the information that was discussed with the <br />Commission. <br /> <br />Case #4: Traprock Commons Park's Riding Arena <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos explained the tin building within Traprock Park was declared <br />surplus property. The purpose of this case is to determine if the boards and posts that remain <br />should be removed or left in their present state. The Commission was to inspect the site in order <br />to make this decision. <br /> <br />Consensus of the Commission was to tear down the building and start over. <br /> <br />Park and Recreation Commission/January 9, 2003 <br /> Page 7 of 9 <br /> <br /> <br />