My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 06/17/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2010 - 2019
>
2014
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 06/17/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 10:39:18 AM
Creation date
6/23/2014 12:24:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
06/17/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The 2009 estimated costs for reconstructing Andrie Street and 164th Lane as 32 foot wide streets with concrete <br />curb and gutter, storm sewer, and a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk along one side was $1,813,000 including indirect <br />costs. If the 5 foot concrete sidewalk is removed and the streets are widened by 4 feet to accommodate two 11 foot <br />drive lanes and a 6 foot wide on -road bicycle lane, the estimated cost including indirect costs, becomes $1,647,000. <br />Therefore, based on 2009 estimated costs it is estimated to cost about $166,000less to construct the on -road bike <br />lane than the off -road sidewalk. <br />Based on direction received from the Public Works Committee on May 20th, staff updated the 2009 engineer's <br />estimates to reflect 2014 estimated costs for reconstructing Andrie Street and 164th Lane as a 36-foot wide street <br />with two 11-foot lanes and a 6-foot bike lane at $1,758,000. This includes 20% indirect costs for engineering and <br />administration, and reflects an estimated increase of $111,000 in project costs from 2009 to 2014. <br />Staff also updated the 2009 engineer's estimates to reflect 2014 estimated costs for reconstructing Andrie Street <br />and 164th Lane as a 32 foot wide street with no concrete sidewalk or on -road bike lane, as was originally proposed. <br />This cost is estimated at $1,665,000 and includes 20% indirect costs for engineering and administration. This cost <br />was calculated in the event the Public Works Committee wishes to direct staff to include this option as an <br />alternative in the Feasibility Report due to the fact that special assessments will likely be part of the proposed <br />funding package and, based on previous experience and recent feedback, there will likely be opposition again to <br />incorporating pedestrian facilities into the project. Therefore, by adding the 32 foot street width option as an <br />alternate the project may have a better chance of moving forward without being petitioned against by the residents. <br />Staff is again seeking direction on a funding program for this project based on 2014 estimated costs, but knowing <br />that a draft special assessment policy will be discussed at the July 15th Public Works Committee meeting it might <br />be more productive to wait until the July or August meeting to discuss funding program options for this project. <br />Funding Source: <br />At this time there are not sufficient funds in the MSA account to fund the project so funding would need to be <br />provided using other available sources including the general levy, special assessments, or bonds. As was previously <br />discussed, applying special assessments to this project may be difficult since the adjacent properties are large lots <br />which will provide fewer lots to spread project costs over. <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends waiting until the July or August Public Works Committee meeting to further discuss or provide <br />direction on funding program options for this project. And given that the project will not be constructed in 2014, <br />that the Feasibility Report can be updated relatively quickly, and because there is a shelf life to a Feasibility Report <br />once it is approved by Council, there is not an immediate need to finalize the Feasibility Report at this time. <br />Action: <br />No action is required at this time, but direction by consensus on any project elements that may impact estimated <br />costs are encouraged. <br />Attachments <br />Dec2008 Andrie St Feas Rat w survey <br />Form Review <br />Inbox Reviewed By Date <br />Grant Riemer Grant Riemer 06/12/2014 01:08 PM <br />Kurt Ulrich Kurt Ulrich 06/12/2014 03:20 PM <br />Form Started By: Bruce Westby Started On: 06/10/2014 01:26 PM <br />Final Approval Date: 06/12/2014 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.