My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 06/17/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2010 - 2019
>
2014
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 06/17/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 10:39:18 AM
Creation date
6/23/2014 12:24:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
06/17/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I have considered the issues associated with the installation ot".a sidewalk along the north and <br />east sides uf Andrie Street and 164th Lane in association with a street reconstruction work on <br />these streets, r want the City Council to know that I an: <br />In support of a sidewalk in this location <br />In opposition °Ca sidewalk in ;his location <br />Undecided or nimmil on this kite <br />My property is on the: <br />O'dler Comments: <br />:*1 <br />X '.ast or north wet or south <br />'17+1 • romn <br />REC'D JAN 2 9 2009 <br />side or the stre,et, <br />r• cov,L./11e-" vr.1r• <br />— . <br />rernroMnse.MAII•nr*.••• 11,101,P.VIUMPIMMIWAMM.,...* <br />I have considered the issues associated with the installation of a sidewalk along the north and , <br />east sides or Andric Street and 1.60' Lan .0 in association with a street reconstruction work on <br />these streets, t want the City Cooncil to know that 1 am: <br />In support of a sidewalk in this location <br />Ir. opposition ora sidewalk in this location <br />Undecided er neutral on this issue <br />My property is on the: Mast or north west er south side of the street. <br />Other Comments: <br />We know of many neighbors that were pressured and/or mislead so much by the homeowners' assn, that they signed <br />the opinion surveys in direct opposition to their true opinions. Anyone knowing the facts is left with one logical choice — <br />do the sidewalks now. The aoals of Ram= (and their plans for Northfork) Include installation of walkways at some <br />time; installing them now would cost less (overall costs will increase in the future, and certain things would have to be <br />paid for two times - lawns, sprinkler, etc.); installing them now will mean zero additional cost the homeownela; there <br />will be less inconvenience. to the community having roadwork and sidewalks done at ttle same time; it is safer to walk <br />on a sidewalk than on a roadway; POlic safety should :)e our government's main objective — from that standpoint, there <br />can be no argument. People who argue that it is fiscally irresponsible to spend money on this improvement, are <br />forgetting that money will be spent on these walkways at some point, and that at that time the money could come from <br />their checking accounts instead of MSA funds! <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.