My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 06/17/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2010 - 2019
>
2014
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 06/17/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 10:39:18 AM
Creation date
6/23/2014 12:24:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
06/17/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
property owners or residents in the affected area before sending the Speed Zone Study forward to <br />Anoka County. This is an Anoka County road; however, the City enforces the speed limit <br />Councilmember Riley stated the City cannot change the speed limit on this roadway so he thinks <br />this is not a City problem to solve. <br />Mayor Strommen stated if it presents a safety issue for the City's residents, the City should <br />initiate the process but the question is whether to allow one resident to move the process <br />forward. She stated requiring a petition by five residents is consistent with what is done for other <br />considerations, such as for stop signs. <br />Councilmember Riley stated he does not think even the request of five should involve the City so <br />if it comes forward to the Council, he will vote no because he thinks it is not the City's problem <br />to solve. <br />Vice Chairperson Kuzma stated if a petition by five is the normal course followed, he would <br />support staff' s recommendation. <br />The majority consensus of the Public Works Committee was to require that the Traffic Control <br />Modification Policy be followed and require a petition from five property owners or residents in <br />the affected area before sending the Speed Zone Study forward to Anoka County. <br />5.04: Consider Crosswalk Installation Cost and Options <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer displayed pictures and described three options for <br />crosswalk signs equipped with flashing lights as detailed in the staff report. He presented costs <br />for each option, noting the flashing lights would alert motorists of the approaching crosswalk. <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer recommended using the pedestrian activated crosswalk <br />system if it is the Public Works Committee's intent to install lighting systems at select crosswalk <br />locations. This recommendation is based on the reasoning that if the motorist continually sees <br />the flashing lights, but never encounters pedestrians in the crosswalk, the effectiveness of the <br />flashing lights will be lost. He also recommended that this type of sign, if approved, be used <br />consistently throughout Ramsey. <br />Vice Chairperson Kuzma asked about the potential number of signs. <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer estimated 20 with a cost of $6,500 for each. <br />Councilmember Riley stated with the Armstrong Boulevard crossing, the City asked Anoka <br />County to contribute towards the cost. <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer stated the City is waiting for that answer as that project is <br />not yet completed. <br />Councilmember Riley noted this request will probably be received more often on County <br />roadways and asked if grants are available. <br />Public Works Committee / May 20, 2014 <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.