Resolution - #14-06-099 - 06/05/2014

Home

11. That the Variance allowing the extension of the driveway is in harmony with servicing detached accessory buildings. 12. That the design of the driveway extension will include drain tile and improve drainage on the Subject Property. 13. That the proposed use (driveway extension) is a permitted use in the R -1 Residential (MUSA) zoning district. 14. That economic circumstances alone do not create the practical difficulties. 15. That the plight is due to circumstances unique to the Subject Property. 16. That the plight was not created by the Applicant. 17. That, if granted, the Variance will not alter locality's essential character. 18. That, if granted, the Variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. 19. That, if granted, the Variance will not unreasonably increase congestion on the public street. 20. That, if granted, the Variance will not have the effect of allowing any uses prohibited in the applicable zoning district. 21. That if granted, the Variance will not permit a lesser degree of public health, safety, and general welfare. 22. That, if granted, the Variance will not permit standards that are lower than those required by state law. 23. That, if granted, the Variance will not increase the danger of fire or endanger public safety. 24. That, if granted, the Variance will not diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner Van Scoy, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Chairperson Levine Commissioner Bauer Commissioner Van Scoy Commissioner Brauer Commissioner Maul Commissioner Nosan RESOLUTION #14 -06 -099 Page 2 of 3