My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 07/15/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2010 - 2019
>
2014
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 07/15/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 10:39:37 AM
Creation date
7/16/2014 9:10:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
07/15/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Public Works Committee 5. 2. <br />Meeting Date: 07/15/2014 <br />By: Grant Riemer, Engineering/Public <br />Works <br />Title: <br />Engineering Study for Pedestrian Crosswalk at Armstrong Blvd/161st Ave <br />Purpose/Background: <br />In 2011 Anoka County installed, at the City of Ramsey's request, a pedestrian crosswalk at the intersection of <br />Armstrong Blvd and 161st Ave. The crosswalk is signed and marked appropriately to current standards. Central <br />Park is located on the northeast corner of the intersection. This park is home to organized sporting events and a <br />large playground and picnic area that is frequented by families from the surrounding neighborhoods. The parking <br />lots are also used duringGame Fair which draws close to 50,000 people over the two weekend event. The city, with <br />the county's permission, extended our trail system through their ROW, which entailed extending a culvert and <br />connecting our trail system to the crosswalk. At the June 18th 2013 PW Committee meeting staff received a request <br />from a resident living close to the intersection to provide a trail segment on the west side of Armstrong Blvd at the <br />crosswalk location, so people wouldn't have to stand in the ditch while waiting to use the crosswalk and also to <br />make the crosswalk ADA compliant. This part of the trail was constructed in 2014 as part of the trail project that <br />connects Alpine Dr to 161 st ave and is now in use. The second part of the request was to ask Anoka County, if they <br />would be agreeable to install some fashion of pedestrian activated crossing signal, to help motorists be more aware <br />of pedestrians using the crosswalk. Staff contacted Anoka County Highway in 7/13 and requested the pedestrian <br />activated crosswalk warning system. The next step would be to complete some type of an engineering evaluation to <br />determine if the crosswalk would meet warrants for some type of a pedestrian crossing signal, or if the intersection <br />would meet warrants for a signal. Since the crosswalk was installed by City request, ACHD would be looking for <br />the City to take the lead in completing the engineering evaluation. If the crosswalk or intersection met warrants for <br />some type of a pedestrian or traffic signal, then the county's standard Cost Share policy would apply, and ACHD <br />would look to work with the City on a JPA and budgeting for the construction of the pedestrian or traffic signal. If <br />the pedestrian crossing or intersection does not meet warrants, we could still work with the City on a JPA for the <br />construction, but the full cost share of the pedestrian or traffic signal would be the City's. On July 1st 2014 staff <br />monitored the cross walk for activity from 6:00 pm-7:00pm. This hour was chosen because staff felt the athletic <br />activities starting at Central Part at that time would generate the largest amount of pedestrians. During that hour 12 <br />pedestrians used the crosswalk. 6 had no wait time, 3 had a 5 second delay in crossing the road and 3 had a 24 <br />second delay in crossing. 224 vehicles were counted on Armstrong Blvd during this hour. A search of the police <br />records show no pedestrian/ vehicle crashes in the last 5 years. <br />Timeframe: <br />10 Minutes <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />If we follow the The Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Evaluation Flowchart discussed earlier this evening, the <br />recommendation would be to consider no changes to the crossing. The Pedestrian Level of Service (LOS) is rated at <br />a Level C which is defined as "delay noticeable to pedestrians, but not inconveniencing" <br />Funding Source: <br />Trail dedication fund and general fund <br />Recommendation: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.