Laserfiche WebLink
4. Resolution #14 -07 -137 Approving Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Zoning <br />Amendment and Preliminary Plat <br />Public Hearing <br />Chairperson Levine called the public hearing to order at 7:15 p.m. <br />Presentation <br />Development Services Manager Gladhill presented the staff report stating the purpose of this <br />case was to consider a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment and Preliminary <br />Plat approval for a seven (7) lot single family subdivision that is immediately adjacent to Rivlyn <br />Avenue that will extend an existing cul -de -sac. The site is located on the easternmost border of <br />the City, adjacent to the City of Anoka. The purpose of the Preliminary Plat is to provide <br />approval of the layout and configuration of the Plat. The Planning Commission should consider <br />Preliminary Plat approval to be approval of the plat itself, with the Final Plat approving a <br />document for recording as well as approving the final construction plans to achieve the approved <br />layout. The Final Plat is not reviewed by the Planning Commission. A video from MnDOT on <br />the plans for Highway 10 was viewed. He requested the Commission consider how the proposed <br />plat fits in with the Highway 10 Access Study. Staff reviewed the proposal in further detail and <br />questioned how the Commission wanted to proceed with the subdivision. It was noted the <br />request was under the 60 day review. <br />Citizen Input <br />Chairperson Levine supported this case be postponed. <br />Commissioner Bauer was in favor of holding off as well until the service road location has been <br />determined. He stated it would make the most sense for the service road to have the southern <br />route. <br />Commissioner Brauer recommended the public hearing be recessed. He suggested the <br />Commission not make a decision on this matter until the MnDOT study was completed. He did <br />not want the Planning Commission to have to deny the request because it did not have enough <br />information. Development Services Manager Gladhill explained the public hearing could be <br />postponed, but suggested comments be taken this evening. <br />Commissioner Nosan questioned where the trail would be located. Development Services <br />Manager Gladhill reviewed the proposed trail location on the current plans with the Commission. <br />He indicated the Parks Commission supported the reconfiguration of the trail. He commented <br />that the trail location can be approved by the Park Commission prior to this item moving <br />forward. <br />Randy Deers, representative from Village Bank, explained the subject property has been for sale <br />for the past two years and there has been no interest. After discussing the property with a <br />Planning Commission /July 10, 2014 <br />Page 4 of 10 <br />