My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/11/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2014
>
Agenda - Council - 08/11/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:22:29 PM
Creation date
8/13/2014 10:44:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/11/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
872
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Regular Session 7. 5. <br />Meeting Date: 08/11/2014 <br />By: Bruce Westby, Engineering/Public <br />Works <br />Information <br />Title <br />Consider approving revised Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization Joint Powers Agreement. <br />Purpose/Background: <br />Purpose: <br />The purpose of this case is to approve the revised (amended and restated) Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) for the <br />Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization (LRRWMO), which is attached to this case in both clean <br />and redline versions. The revised LRRWMO JPA as drafted by LRRWMO attorney Charles LeFevere with <br />Kennedy & Graven clarifies certain provisions of the JPA related to the funding of capital improvement projects, <br />updates citations to state law making the form of the citations uniform, provides for the consistent use of defined <br />terms, cleans up typos and grammatical errors, remove all references to Coon Rapids since they are no longer a <br />member city, and extends the term of the agreement another 10 years to January 1, 2025. <br />Background: <br />As has been discussed at numerous Council work sessions and meetings, the existing Lower Rum River Watershed <br />Management Organization (LRRWMO) Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) provides for each member city to receive <br />one vote on any matter requiring a vote. Since there are currently three member cities in the LRRWMO (Andover, <br />Anoka, and Ramsey), each city receives one-third of the total vote. The City of Ramsey has historically paid about <br />half of the LRRWMO's annual costs due to our large area of land within the Lower Rum River watershed and our <br />net tax capacity. Comparatively, both Andover and Anoka pay considerably less. Considering our greater financial <br />obligation it was discussed that Ramsey should receive a larger percentage of the total vote, especially when <br />considering potential large capital improvement projects such as the proposed Anoka Dam reconstruction. <br />On October 8, 2013, Council member Kuzma proposed an amendment to the LRRWMO Board allowing for <br />weighted voting whenever LRRWMO related capital improvement projects were to be considered. However, any <br />time a simple majority vote would be required, Ramsey would still only receive an equal vote to the other two <br />member cities. This amendment would have allowed capital improvement projects to be approved after receiving a <br />minimum of 66% of the vote with each member city being allocated a percentage of the total vote equivalent to the <br />amount contributed annually to the general fund. This proposal was discussed on several occasions but the <br />LRRWMO Board did not adopt it. The Cities of Andover and Anoka both indicated they didn't approve of the <br />weighted vote as proposed. <br />On March 11, 2014, the City Council reviewed proposed amendments to the LRRWMO JPA as drafted by WMO <br />attorney Charles LeFevere with Kennedy & Graven. A memo summarizing the purpose of the proposed <br />amendments was also reviewed. The memo stated the proposed amendments were intended to clarify certain <br />provisions of the JPA relating to the funding of capital improvement projects, as well as to clean up the JPA in <br />several areas including updating citations to state law and making the form of the citations uniform, provide for the <br />consistent use of defined terms, clean up typos and grammatical errors, remove all references to Coon Rapids since <br />they are no longer a member city, and extending the term of the agreement another 10 years to January 1, 2025. <br />The City Attorney reviewed the proposed amendments and felt that the revised document was an improvement, <br />though more extensive changes could have been made to more clearly set forth the capital improvement project <br />funding process. The City Attorney also felt the revised language would more clearly prevent member cities from <br />being forced to pay a capital improvement project allocation. It was also discussed that if objections are raised to <br />capital improvement project funding, the issue will go to non -binding arbitration, and if that fails, the capital <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.