Laserfiche WebLink
Introduction & MRCCA Rulemaking Background <br />The MRCCA is a unique land corridor along the Mississippi River within the seven - county metro area. <br />The corridor is 72 miles long, 54,000 acres in area, and within the jurisdiction of 30 local governments <br />(LGUs). Land development in the corridor is guided by state regulations, which are currently <br />implemented through local plans and ordinances that are reviewed and approved by the DNR. The <br />Metropolitan Council works with the DNR to review plans and ordinances. <br />The MRCCA was established in the 1970s by Executive Order, a type of state regulation that cannot be <br />readily changed or updated. Over the last decade, it has become increasingly challenging for the state <br />and local governments to administer regulations under the Executive Order because it: <br />• does not provide DNR with clear criteria for evaluating local plans and ordinances, <br />• limits redevelopment and reinvestment in the corridor, <br />• is complex and costly to administer, <br />• provides inadequate resource protection due to vague and outdated language, and <br />• requires that numerous and often conflicting resources and functions be conserved (scenic, <br />environmental, mineral, economic, cultural, and historic) but does not prioritize among them. <br />In 2009, the Minnesota Legislature directed the DNR to establish rules for the MRCCA. The DNR <br />undertook an extensive participation process from 2009 -2010 that resulted in the "2011 draft rules." At <br />the conclusion of the process, the previous administration did not support the proposed rules, and local <br />concern and opposition to the rulemaking was growing. As a result, the rulemaking process halted in <br />2011 and the DNR's statutory authority to do rulemaking expired. In 2013, the Legislature restored <br />DNR's rulemaking authority and made changes to the statutory language guiding rule development, with <br />greater emphasis on addressing local government concerns and consideration of existing and potential <br />new development. <br />The DNR established the following goals to guide this new rulemaking effort: <br />• maintain and improve water quality and habitat, <br />• better recognize existing and planned development, <br />• increase flexibility for local governments, <br />• focus on rules that best achieve resource protection, and <br />• simplify administration and clarify language. <br />Rulemaking Schedule <br />Phase 1: LGU Review <br />During Phase I of the rulemaking schedule (Figure 1), consultation with LGUs was the primary focus of <br />DNR's renewed rulemaking effort. Over the past ten months, DNR staff has met individually with each <br />LGU's staff /officials and three times with a group of LGUs convened by Metro Cities, with multiple <br />follow -up calls and meetings. The DNR has also met with the Metropolitan Council and National Park <br />Service, as well as with several groups representing environmental and development interests. <br />