Comprehensive Plan Update - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Mr. Carl Ohrrn Mr. Jon Olson August 8, 1994 Page 11 • 2005 Expanded MUSA E+C = 703,410 VMT, 24% increase from 1990 Existing and 1% increase from 2005 Base Case E+C • 2005 Base Case E+C+P = 697,670 VIvIT, 23% increase from 1990 Existing • 2005 Expanded MUSA E+C+P = 703,969 VMT, 25% increase from 1990 Existing and 2%0 increase from 2005 Base Case E+C+P • 2015 Base Case E±C = 770,642 VMT, 36% increase from 1990 Existing • 2015 Expanded MUSA E=C = 783,942 VIviT, 39% increase from 1990 Existing and 3% increase from 2015 Base Case E+C • 2015 Base Case E+C+P = 772,248 VMT, 37% increase from 1990 Existing • 2015 Expanded MUSA E+C+P = 782,183 VMT, 38% increase from 1990 Existing and 1% increase from 2015 Base Case E+C+P Results and Conclusions The PM design hour volume level of service (LOS) analysis, as shown in Table 2, reveals the following: 1) -Year 1990 existing conditions are primarily at LOS D, with TH 10/47 near Main Street and TH 252 near I-696 at LOS E. In a metropolitan area, LOS D is an acceptable level of operation. 2) Year 2005 forecast LOS for both scenarios and roadway improvements show that four screenline locations are operating at LOS E. This condition will exist regardless of the MUSA expansion. 3) Year 2015 forecast LOS for both scenarios and roadway improvements show that eight screenline locations are operating at LOS E and that three screenline locations are operating at LOS F. This condition will exist regardless of the MUSA expansion. I G..!�-.e. U V " LL> C — V,7,-„a1Lta.'4/', ,'/.iJ. {_v .-,_.'l+,i-.C., J /11 Z-7,-1., ice': V� %.,i