My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Comprehensive Plan Update
>
Comprehensive Plan
>
Comprehensive Plan (old)
>
1990-1999
>
1995 (Approved)
>
1994 Land Use Study
>
Comprehensive Plan Update
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/8/2024 11:57:33 AM
Creation date
8/18/2014 12:38:56 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
315
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
necessitate eliminating the existing intersection and vacating Armstrong between Hwy. 10 <br />and CR 116. <br />Alternative #2 shows Armstrong as it is now, intersecting with Hwy. 10. This poses <br />traffic flow problems for traffic coming off the bridge road and heading east on Hwy. 10. <br />The intersection and its traffic light stops traffic approximately 1/4 mile from the end of <br />the ramp. Traffic coming off the bridge road as well as traffic already on eastbound Hwy. <br />10 would be merging and stopping at the same point. Congestion on Hwy. 10 could <br />possibly be made worse rather than alleviated. Since relieving congestion on the highway <br />is a primary goal of constructing a river bridge, the western bridge alignment need to be <br />considered carefully. <br />Another difficulty is that the western alignment means the bridge road travels over more <br />land and over two proposed roads --the highway frontage/business access road and the <br />residential collector. This would require two bridges. The eastern bridge alignment <br />requires only one overpass. Because this overpass would be close to the highway <br />overpass, there would be less need for grade changes of the bridge road. The western <br />bridge alignments, in contrast, would require either two overpasses in addition to the <br />highway overpass or would require that the entire bridge road be elevated for its entire <br />length --approximately 3/4 mile. The road from the eastern bridge alignment would be less <br />than 1/2 mile long from the river to the Hwy. 10 overpass. <br />EXTRATERRITORIAL ZONING <br />Regarding the traffic through the northern parts of the city, the Commission discussed the <br />possibility of planning for the area along Co. Rd. 83 (Armstrong Blvd. NW) north of the <br />municipal boundary in Burns Township. Staff researched the options for such planning. <br />Minnesota statutes provide for extraterritorial municipal zoning and subdivision authority <br />under certain conditions. <br />A city may by ordinance extend the application of its zoning regulations to <br />unincorporated territory located within two miles of its limits in any direction, but not in <br />a county or town which has adopted zoning regulations; ... Any city may thereafter <br />enforce such regulations in the area to the same extent as if such property were situated <br />within its corporate limits, until the county or town board adopts a comprehensive <br />zoning regulation which includes the area. <br />MN Stat 462.357 subd. 1 <br />A municipality may by ordinance extend the application of its subdivision regulations to <br />unincorporated territory located within two miles of its limits in any direction, but not in <br />a town which has adopted zoning regulations; <br />MN Stat 462.358 subd. la <br />(For these sections, a municipality is defined as any city or town. MN Stat 462.352 subd. <br />2) <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.