Comprehensive Plan Update - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Mr. Gromberg agreed to provide a cost estimate for the west alignment as proposed by the Planning Commission. Thus far he has not provided this information. Deceptive Information On page 1 of his report, Mr. Gromberg indicates there are no plans to extend C.R. #116 beyond Armstrong Boulevard N.W. While this is technically correct, he also knows Mr. Schroeder is meeting with Anoka County to determine how C.R. #116 should be extended. Although Mr. Schroeder has not met with the Planning Commission, he proposed an extension of C.R. #116 which differs from the Planning Commission's recommendation. The number of businesses and acquisition costs have been minimized. Mr. Gromberg used tax assessments instead of market value. This favors the east alternative. Dave Bertelson, Area Manager for Skelgas, stated the cost to relocate the Skelgas plant would exceed $300,000 (see attached memo). He based this on the actual cost he incurred to move a smaller plant in Wisconsin. On page 2, Gromberg states the cost is actually $20,000 to $50,000 and implies this is an estimate from Bud Strom. When Commissioner Hendriksen contacted Mr. Strom, he learned that Mr. Strom had not viewed the property, seen any photographs or been provided an inventory of the Skelgas facility. Mr. Strom said he couldn't provide any more than a rough guess. A safe interchange may require acquisition of both propane dealers. Contrary to Mr. Gromberg's statement, the Planning Commission does not recommend acquiring the business property on the north side of Highway #10 between Armstrong Boulevard N.W. and Ramsey Boulevard N.W. Marketing vs. Planning Staff is only a benefit if the data they provide is above reproach. There is no benefit when Councilmembers and Commissioners must verify information collected by Staff. The analysis prepared by Mr. Gromberg appears biased in favor of EDC's position. CONCLUSION The east altemative costs more, is less functional, offers less development potential, conflicts with Dayton, and will result in a net loss of jobs and business in Ramsey. The east alternative has no advantage other than it uses some right-of-way which has been set aside. The Mississippi River Park is a better use for this property. Planning Subcommittee Memo to Council/January 13, 1995 Page 3 of 3