Laserfiche WebLink
January 3, 1995 <br />To: Planning Commission <br />From: Terry Hendriksen <br />Subject: Draft of Transportation Plan Update <br />The City Council asked us to update the Transportation Plan. Our recommendation is <br />complete, however, the location selected for the Mississippi River bridge is controversial <br />and the Economic Development Commission has developed an alternative plan. <br />This memo will focus on three things, benefits of the Planning Commission alternative, <br />shortcomings of the EDC plan, and errors in the December 12, 1994 report from Jim <br />Gromberg, Economic Development Coordinator. <br />1. i3ENEFITS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ALTERNATIVE <br />Planning Commission concluded that although a Mississippi River bridge is a very <br />significant element of our Transportation Plan we must develop a "Transportation <br />Skeleton" that will support both bridge locations. The "Transportation Skeleton" should <br />exhibit good planning, even if a bridge is not built. <br />Transportation Skeleton <br />Industrial Boulevard (CR 116) is scheduled for extension to Armstrong boulevard. <br />Ramsey is meeting with Anoka County to determine the desired extension of 116 beyond <br />Armstrong. <br />The Planning commission recommended extending 116 West, beyond Armstrong, to <br />Highway 10. A grade separated intersection is desirable. This improves Ramsey's <br />commercial/industrial development potential, provides an East/West collector through <br />our industrial area and would be an attractive alternative for some highway 10 traffic. <br />West Bridge <br />A new Mississippi bridge will generate significant traffic volume. The intersection of the <br />bridge approach and Highway 10 can be a prime retail/commercial location if space is <br />available. Property surrounding the West bridge corridor is currently undeveloped. <br />Hundreds of acres outside the critical rivers boundary are available for development with <br />the West alternative. <br />Because the West alternative is undeveloped land, there is no impact on current <br />residential use. Enough property exists to allow development of the bridge approach <br />corridor, commercial retail uses and "mixed use" residential for buffering. <br />