My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/24/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2014
>
Agenda - Council - 06/24/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:20:45 PM
Creation date
8/22/2014 3:07:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/24/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
365
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Regular Session 4. 9. <br />Meeting Date: 06/24/2014 <br />By: Chris Anderson, Community <br />Development <br />Information <br />Title <br />Adopt Resolution #14-06-115 Approving an Encroachment Agreement for an Existing Deck Partially Located in a <br />Drainage and Utility Easement at 5590 148th Lane <br />Purpose/Background: <br />In 1995, the City processed and approved a building permit for a deck on the property located at 5590 148th Lane <br />NW (the "Subject Property"). The current owner of the Subject Property recently submitted a building permit <br />application to add guard rails and a staircase to the existing deck. As part of that review, it was discovered that the <br />original deck was partially located within a drainage and utility easement (the "Easement") on the Subject Property. <br />Notification: <br />No notification is required to consider an Encroachment Agreement. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />The existing deck on the Subject Property appears to encroach four (4) feet into the Easement. The Easement width <br />on the Subject Property is ten (10) feet, but has an overall width of twenty (20) feet (a portion of the Easement is on <br />the adjacent property to west). The extra width of the Easement is due to a storm sewer pipe that carries drainage <br />from 148th Lane to a wetland area in the rear of the Subject Property. There have not been any documented issues <br />with the storm sewer pipe resulting from the deck encroachment. <br />In reviewing this matter with the Engineering Department, it was requested that the proposed stairway be <br />repositioned, if possible, to prevent any further encroachment into the Easement. The owner of the Subject Property <br />has reconfigured the design of the stairway so that it does not encroachment into the Easement at all. The existing <br />deck and proposed stairway comply with all other zoning standards. <br />The encroachment has been reviewed by the Engineering Department and they are supportive of executing an <br />Encroachment Agreement to address this existing encroachment. <br />Alternatives: <br />Option #1: Approve Resolution #14-06-115 approving an Encroachment Agreement for an existing deck that <br />partially encroaches into a drainage and utility easement. A Building Permit was originally issued for the deck; <br />however, there is no record of a site plan indicating the location of the deck on the Subject Property. However, the <br />deck has been in place since 1995 and there have been no documented issues as a result of the encroachment. The <br />current owner of the Subject Property has demonstrated willingness to reconfigure the proposed new stairway to <br />avoid additional encroachment in the easement area. City Staff has reviewed the existing encroachment and is <br />supportive of correcting this through an Encroachment Agreement, which specifies responsibilities should work be <br />necessary within the easement area. Staff supports this option. <br />Option #2: Do not approve Resolution #14-06-115 granting an Encroachment Agreement for an existing deck <br />partially encroaching in a drainage and utility easement. The deck has been in place since 1995 without creating any <br />documented issues with either the storm sewer pipe or drainage. If the Encroachment Agreement is not approved, it <br />will result in the deck needing to be either modified to eliminate the encroachment or removed entirely. Staff does <br />not support this option. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.